Key Takeaways
Bitcoin slipping under $100,000 has reignited a question that resurfaces every cycle: Who’s actually responsible for these wild price swings?
Spoiler: It’s not the average investor buying $50 a week on a crypto app. Nor is it the casual day trader hoping to time the bottom.
The reality is that a complex network of forces shapes Bitcoin’s price: some transparent, some hidden, and most operating on a scale much larger than anything retail investors can influence.
When BTC breaks a major psychological level, it’s rarely because you or I bought or sold a few hundred dollars’ worth. It’s because deep-pocketed players and macro-level mechanisms are shifting the market.
Let’s break down who really moves the BTC price when it takes a plunge or goes on a tear.
When Bitcoin was young, a handful of early adopters and miners controlled a significant portion of the supply. While ownership has broadened, whale wallets holding thousands to hundreds of thousands of BTC still command enormous influence.

In a low-liquidity moment, such as a weekend or after a prolonged rally, one massive sell order can trigger a broader downturn.
Retail isn’t triggering these moves. Whales are.
Institutions used to stay away from Bitcoin. Now they shape almost every major move, thanks to ETFs, hedge fund flows, and publicly traded companies with BTC-heavy strategies.
ETF flows dominate the modern price cycle:
However, 2025 introduced a new institutional red flag: Strategy’s market cap fell below the value of its Bitcoin holdings.

This inversion has sparked debate for two reasons:
Some analysts, including Bitget CEO Gracy Chen, argue that the next significant Bitcoin move may now hinge not on corporate buyers, but on macroeconomic shifts, specifically interest rate cuts. A more dovish environment could restore confidence; sustained high rates could deepen the inversion.
Corporate treasuries don’t just buy Bitcoin; they shape narratives. And narratives move prices.
Market makers (MMs) don’t predict Bitcoin’s direction: they scaffold the market’s structure.
How market makers influence BTC price:
When liquidity dries up, even modest institutional orders can produce dramatic price swings.
The derivatives market now has a greater influence on BTC than spot trading.
Why leverage drives extreme volatility:
This mechanical feedback loop is why Bitcoin often plunges sharply, then stabilizes just as quickly: the leverage resets.
Options markets add another layer, with hedging flows around expiration dates contributing to predictable volatility bands.
Retail cannot compete with a liquidation engine handling billions in leveraged contracts.
Miners steadily sell BTC to cover operational costs. Their influence is subtle but persistent.
Miners move the market when:
Miner selling rarely causes sudden crashes, but it can amplify downward momentum, especially if miners transfer unusually large amounts to exchanges.
Bitcoin’s biggest moves are increasingly driven by global macroeconomic conditions, rather than crypto-specific news.
Major macro triggers:
Bitget CEO Gracy Chen’s view reflects a growing consensus: the next major Bitcoin move hinges on whether interest rates begin to fall.
A lower-rate environment could reignite risk appetite and ETF inflows; higher-for-longer rates keep pressure on speculative assets, especially those with leverage-heavy ecosystems.
Retail sentiment cannot override the global cost of capital.
Narratives don’t cause giant moves, but they accelerate them.
Narrative drivers include:
Narratives are the emotional layer on top of structural market forces.
With Bitcoin back under $100,000, is it a good time to buy the dip? Or another downside move is on the horizon?
Nigel Green, CEO of the advisor deVere Group, told CCN that the renewed slide, which has taken Bitcoin to its weakest level since May, has triggered intense speculation about whether deeper losses are coming, but the underlying dynamics point to something very different.
“Every major correction in Bitcoin’s history has opened the door to substantial upside for patient investors. This cycle is likely to be no exception,” he notes.
“The structural drivers are strengthening even as short-term sentiment weakens.”

Green highlights the fixed-supply model, the expanding participation of institutions and sovereign entities, and the embedding of digital-asset infrastructure across global finance.
“Bitcoin remains the reference asset for the digital economy. Its role is increasing, not diminishing,” he says.
The recent selling by long-term holders is significant, yet the deVere chief executive views it as part of a typical reset phase following an extended run.
“Corrections clear excess leverage, concentrate ownership, and reset expectations. Those resets typically create fertile ground for the next expansion,” he says.
He believes many investors will bide their time before re-entering the market. “This period will likely attract capital that has been waiting on the sidelines for a decisive entry point,” he says.
“When the dust settles, the blend of lower prices, stronger hands and ongoing adoption becomes highly compelling.”
Bitcoin’s drop below $100K is driven by a combination of factors, including whale activity, institutional flows (like ETFs), leveraged trading liquidations, macroeconomic conditions, and market sentiment. Retail investors have minimal influence on major price swings.
Whales are large holders of Bitcoin, often owning thousands to hundreds of thousands of BTC. Their movements, such as transferring Bitcoin to exchanges, can create selling pressure and trigger broader price fluctuations, particularly during periods of low liquidity.
Institutional investors, through ETFs, hedge funds, and corporate treasuries, now control billions in BTC flows. Large ETF inflows can spark rallies, while outflows create downward pressure. Corporate actions, such as Strategy trading below its BTC holdings, also affect market sentiment.
Experts suggest patience. Corrections often reset leverage, concentrate ownership, and create fertile ground for future gains. Lower prices combined with strong hands, institutional adoption, and ongoing infrastructure growth can provide compelling long-term opportunities.