Key Takeaways
Under Senate Rule XXII, a cloture petition filed on August 5 would permit a floor vote on the motion to proceed as early as August 7, the last working day before the Senate recess begins on August 10.
No cloture motion had been filed as of this writing, and no floor vote is scheduled.
The CLARITY Act, the 616-page Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, H.R. 3633, has passed the House, cleared the Senate Banking Committee, and sat on the Senate Legislative Calendar at Calendar No. 423 since June 1 without a floor vote.
What follows is the most granular public accounting of who stands where and why.
+76
Republicans hold 53 Senate seats. Passage requires 60 votes to overcome a filibuster, meaning at least seven Democrats must cross the aisle. If all 53 Republicans support cloture, seven Democrats are the minimum. If any Republicans defect, that number rises.
Two Democrats, Ruben Gallego of Arizona and Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland, voted the bill out of the Senate Banking Committee in May.
Both have since made their floor votes conditional on ethics provisions that the Republican draft published July 22 did not satisfy. Both Gallego and Alsobrooks immediately opposed the July 22 version upon its release.
That means the confirmed Democratic floor support count as of August 5 is zero.
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott and Majority Leader John Thune have coordinated the July push. Thune told Punchbowl News that he does not expect the Senate to pass crypto market-structure legislation before the August recess, dealing a major setback to negotiations over the CLARITY Act.
Senator Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, the bill’s lead sponsor, published the merged text in July and has been its most visible legislative champion, warning that momentum like this will not come around again this decade.
Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio co-led negotiations with Lummis. Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana locked in his committee yes vote as the thirteenth Republican needed for committee passage.
The National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives, known as NOBLE, backed the bill in July, joining law enforcement groups that Senate Banking Republicans assembled as a direct counter to Democratic objections over Section 604 developer protections.
The Fraternal Order of Police and the National Sheriffs’ Association had previously endorsed it. Former Secretary of Defense Mark Esper publicly argued for passage, saying that American leadership in technology shaping economic and strategic futures is at stake.
On the industry side, the coalition is broad and well-funded. Coinbase, Kraken, and other major exchanges have lobbied publicly for the bill. Stand With Crypto reported that supporters contacted lawmakers one million times, urging passage before the August 7 recess.
Grayscale urged Senate leaders to hold a vote before recess, warning that further delay threatens US competitiveness. More than 200 organizations, including crypto exchanges, venture capital firms, and financial services companies, sent a coordinated letter to Senate leadership.
Former Barclays CEO Bob Diamond said Circle and Hyperliquid could be among the biggest winners if the bill passes. Goldman Sachs publicly backed the bill for the market structure clarity it would provide. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent pushed back against critics and demanded Senate action.
The White House coordinated with Senate Republicans on the ethics provision, reaching an agreement with Lummis and Moreno on language that includes a 2029 sunset and Justice Department enforcement authority. However, the White House has not formally endorsed the merged text and has been described as inactive in negotiations at key moments.
Senators Chris Murphy of Connecticut, Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon formally opposed the bill after the July 22 draft omitted the ethics provision Democrats had demanded. Their formal opposition simultaneously removes three potential crossover votes from the pool.
Five committee Democrats declined to support the bill at the May markup: Senators Mark Warner of Virginia, Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, Raphael Warnock of Georgia, Andy Kim of New Jersey, and Lisa Blunt Rochester of Delaware.
None has publicly reversed that position. Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey issued a statement saying the new CLARITY Act text still fails to address the bill’s shortcomings in ethics, consumer protection, and illicit finance.
A Senate Banking Committee minority staff analysis renewed Democratic objections that the bill preserves pathways for President Trump to continue profiting from crypto ventures after disclosures showed approximately $1.4 billion in 2025 earnings tied to crypto activities, including World Liberty Financial and memecoins.
Seven Democratic negotiators said on July 22 that the Republican draft falls short on ethics, consumer protection, and national security provisions, and no public statement from either side has confirmed that those gaps were subsequently closed.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, ranking Democrat on Banking, filed 44 amendments during committee markup, most of which were rejected, and has described the bill as a threat to the economy. She remains the most prominent single opponent on the Democratic side.
The American Bankers Association sent more than 8,000 letters to Senate offices urging amendments to gut the Tillis-Alsobrooks stablecoin yield compromise. The Bank Policy Institute highlighted what it described as critical shortcomings in the bill.
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon publicly opposed the stablecoin yield provisions, arguing they allow digital asset platforms to pay deposit-equivalent interest without the corresponding consumer protections that banks must provide.
The banking sector’s opposition targets the stablecoin yield language rather than the entire bill, but their concentrated lobbying has given wavering Democratic senators with strong ties to the banking industry institutional cover to hold out.
Coinbase reversed its January 2026 opposition to the CLARITY Act after banking compromises reshaped key provisions, exposing divisions within the industry about whether the bill adequately protects different segments of the market.
Early Senate drafts would have flatly banned affiliates of an exchange from trading on it, a provision that drew concern from some quarters before being modified.
The reversal itself became a story because it demonstrated that even the bill’s biggest commercial beneficiaries had significant reservations about its initial form.
Galaxy Research cut its estimated probability of CLARITY Act enactment in 2026 from 50% to 30%. Bernstein similarly lowered its odds.
Polymarket odds on 2026 passage fell from a February peak above 80% to 13% as of August 5. Brian Gardner of Stifel wrote in May that the bill’s prospects would deteriorate materially if the Senate failed to pass it before the August recess. Senator John Kennedy warned that the bill’s prospects will weaken if the Senate cannot secure a positive vote before the break.
Bernstein argued that if the CLARITY Act fails, the SEC and CFTC could move ahead with broader crypto rulemaking under the Trump administration’s Project Crypto initiative. SEC Chair Paul Atkins has argued that if Congress does not establish a statutory framework, his agency can deliver crypto rules without it.
The SEC’s Regulation Crypto, a new fundraising exemption Atkins placed in the agency’s July priority slot and described as a bridge to the CLARITY Act, would become the operative framework for US crypto capital formation if the bill fails this session.
The consequence of missing August 7 is not a regulatory vacuum but a regulatory uncertainty of a different kind. Agency guidance is more easily reversed by the next administration than statute. The GENIUS Act’s experience is instructive: signed into law in July 2025, its agencies missed their one-year rulemaking deadline entirely, with zero final rules issued as of July 18, 2026.
Stalled crypto legislation has already been cited by Citi as a drag on its Bitcoin and Ether price forecasts. The Supreme Court’s June 29, 2026, ruling in Trump v. Slaughter, which allowed the president to remove independent agency commissioners at will, added a further layer of institutional vulnerability to any agency-level framework lacking statutory backing.
The CLARITY Act is not dead as of August 5. It is alive, unscheduled, and running out of calendar. Whether a cloture motion is filed today determines whether August 7 is a vote or just another day the bill remains at Calendar No. 423.