Key Takeaways
Colombian President Gustavo Petro wants the country’s Caribbean coast to become part of the global Bitcoin mining economy.
His vision is ambitious: use renewable energy resources in cities such as Santa Marta, Riohacha, and Barranquilla to attract Bitcoin miners, investment, and spur new economic activity in northern Colombia.
But while the political narrative focuses on clean energy and regional development, the economics of Bitcoin mining in 2026 paint a much harsher story.
At current electricity prices and network conditions, industrial-scale Bitcoin mining in Colombia appears deeply unprofitable.
+81
+76
+217
Petro raised the idea publicly while discussing renewable energy and economic development in Colombia’s Caribbean region.
He argued that countries with abundant clean energy resources, such as Venezuela and Paraguay, have already attracted Bitcoin mining investment, and suggested Colombia could follow a similar path.
“[Translated] If virtual currencies are based on fossil energy, global warming explodes, and climate collapse ensues,” Petro said.
He specifically pointed to cities along the Caribbean coast as potential mining centers.
Petro called for discussions with the Wayúu community so local populations could become co-owners of future projects rather than passive observers.
The proposal fits Petro’s push toward energy transition policies and regional infrastructure development.
But the problem is that Colombia currently lacks the most important ingredient for competitive mining economics. Extremely cheap power.
Bitcoin mining profitability hasn’t been the same since the 2024 halving.
As of this writing, Bitcoin trades near $81,000, while the global network hash rate has climbed to roughly 950 EH/s.
That combination has pushed mining margins lower across much of the world.
Today, profitable industrial mining operations generally require electricity costs below $0.05 per kilowatt-hour to remain highly competitive.
Colombia is nowhere near that level.
Published industrial electricity rates in Colombia currently stand at $0.203/kWh.
Even with negotiated discounts, effective large-scale mining rates remain far above what miners in Paraguay, Brazil, or Argentina can access.
Using current network conditions and standard industrial ASIC efficiency assumptions, electricity alone would cost an estimated $155,000 or more to mine a single Bitcoin in Colombia.
That figure exceeds Bitcoin’s current market price by a wide margin. And that only includes electricity.

Cooling systems, maintenance, staffing, infrastructure, taxes, and equipment financing would push real operating costs even higher.
In practical terms, large-scale mining operations in Colombia would currently lose money before accounting for most operating expenses.
Then comes the regional comparison, which makes Colombia’s challenge even clearer.
Countries that continue attracting industrial Bitcoin miners in 2026 all share one common trait.
They have access to stranded, surplus, or heavily discounted energy.
Paraguay remains one of the strongest examples globally thanks to hydroelectric surplus from the Itaipu Dam.
Effective mining power deals there still range between $0.04 and $0.05/kWh, allowing miners to maintain estimated electricity margins above 50% under current conditions.
Certain regions in Brazil also remain competitive, particularly where miners can tap into excess wind, hydro, or solar generation through curtailment agreements and free-market energy structures.
Argentina offers another path through flared natural gas projects in Vaca Muerta, though profitability varies significantly with gas pricing and political stability.
Elsewhere, conditions deteriorate rapidly.
Mexico’s industrial electricity rates remain too high for profitable mining without specialized energy agreements.
El Salvador’s geothermal-powered mining ambitions continue to face difficult economics despite the country’s Bitcoin-friendly policies.
Caribbean islands face even steeper obstacles.
Many rely heavily on diesel and imported fuel for electricity generation, resulting in some of the highest electricity costs in the Americas.
Combined with high cooling demands from tropical climates, industrial Bitcoin mining becomes economically difficult to justify.
Petro’s argument reflects a common misconception in political discussions around Bitcoin mining.
Renewable energy availability alone does not automatically create a viable mining industry.
What matters is whether miners can access surplus electricity at extremely low, stable prices over long periods.
Paraguay succeeds because it produces more hydroelectric power than it consumes domestically.
Some Brazilian projects work because miners absorb excess renewable energy that would otherwise go to waste.
Colombia, by contrast, still faces relatively high grid costs, transmission constraints, and limited access to deeply discounted industrial energy agreements.
That does not mean Bitcoin mining projects are impossible in Colombia.
Small-scale or experimental operations tied directly to stranded renewable energy could emerge in specific regions.
But building a globally competitive “Bitcoin mining empire” under current economics would be extremely difficult.
The economics of Bitcoin mining have changed dramatically over the past two years.
Higher network competition and lower block rewards have compressed margins worldwide, making operational efficiency more important than ever.
Even electricity costs around $0.06/kWh — once considered highly competitive — now produce much thinner margins than before.
That leaves very little room for countries with average or above-average energy prices.
There’s also the issue of miners leaving for AI infrastructure to improve profitability, but that’s a different story.
For Colombia, the current reality creates a difficult balancing act between political ambition and market economics.
Petro’s vision may align with broader goals around renewable development and regional investment.
But unless Colombia can secure dramatically lower electricity prices for miners, the country risks entering an industry where the numbers do not add up.