Key Takeaways
For years, people have repeated the same line: “I’m too late. I missed Bitcoin.”
But this belief rests on a fundamental misunderstanding of how Bitcoin works, and more importantly, how Bitcoin mints new supply.
Most investors think “being early” means buying Bitcoin in 2010, 2013, or maybe 2017. But timing Bitcoin adoption isn’t about calendar years. It’s about block height and the number of blocks with rewards remaining.
To understand why, it’s important to understand the block subsidy, how it works, and what it reveals about Bitcoin’s future.
The Bitcoin block subsidy is the amount of newly created Bitcoin awarded to miners each time they successfully add a new block to the blockchain.
It began at 50 BTC per block in 2009, and it halves every 210,000 blocks, approximately every four years.

This halving schedule defines Bitcoin’s entire monetary structure. Here’s how the block subsidy has changed across halving eras:
| Block Height | Halving | Subsidy (BTC) | Year |
| 0 | 0 | 50 BTC | 2009 |
| 210,000 | 1 | 25 BTC | 2012 |
| 420,000 | 2 | 12.5 BTC | 2016 |
| 630,000 | 3 | 6.25 BTC | 2020 |
| 840,000 | 4 | 3.125 BTC | 2024 |
| … | … | … | … |
| 6,930,000 | 33 | 0 BTC | 2140 |
Eventually, the subsidy reaches zero. When that happens, miners rely entirely on transaction fees.
But here’s the part most people misunderstand: each halving dramatically reduces supply long before the total number of blocks is anywhere near complete.
What the data actually shows is shocking:
This is the asymmetry almost everyone overlooks, and it’s why the final 5% of Bitcoin’s issuance could create more millionaires than the first 95%.
Even though Bitcoin has only mined a small fraction of its lifetime block count, almost all the subsidy has already been issued. This is because the halving schedule is front-loaded.
Block subsidies drop fast:
This means we are early in terms of available supply, but early in terms of block timeline. Most people look at a chart and think, “Bitcoin is already expensive, so I’m late.”

However, a more accurate framing is that you’re early relative to the remaining 6 million blocks that still carry the last 5% of issuance.
That 5% will be distributed slowly, over more than a century, into a world where Bitcoin adoption will be exponentially higher.
The first 95% of Bitcoin subsidy was minted when:
But the final 5% will be minted under entirely different conditions.
Bitcoin becomes dramatically more scarce with every halving. By the final epochs:
This creates the most complex asset humans have ever seen.
In the coming century, Bitcoin will collide with:
When an asset with fixed supply meets exploding demand, the result is a monumental wealth transfer.
Here’s the counterintuitive truth: Buying Bitcoin early isn’t about price; it’s about acquiring BTC while block rewards still exist.
When you buy now, you are still competing with miners who receive subsidies. When subsidies approach zero, your competition disappears.
This asymmetry is why people who think they’re “late” may actually be among the earliest participants.
Not everyone agrees with the thesis that Bitcoin’s final 5% will generate outsized wealth. In fact, some of Bitcoin’s most vocal critics argue the opposite.
Prominent economist and gold advocate Peter Schiff questioned whether Bitcoin’s scarcity is absolute or just a matter of perception.
“What if Bitcoin’s supply was 21B instead of 21M?” Schiff asked, suggesting this would be possible if “1 BTC was redefined as 100,000 satoshis instead of 1 million satoshis.”
He continued: “Would it still feel scarce? 100M is just an arbitrary construct. The supply of Bitcoin is actually meaningless. It’s the satoshi supply that counts.”
Schiff’s argument attempts to show that Bitcoin’s valuation stems from perceived scarcity rather than inherent economic properties.

Bitcoin proponents quickly refuted the claim, comparing it to making a pizza bigger by slicing it smaller or redefining gold measurements. Value investor Mike Alfred summed up the reaction: “What if you were a giant purple dinosaur instead of a man? Absurdity invites more absurdity.”
The critique followed a week where Bitcoin surged while gold traded sideways. Schiff argued this wasn’t evidence of Bitcoin’s strength: “CNBC is once again touting Bitcoin’s recent outperformance of gold.… But Bitcoin is a risk asset — it rallied with tech stocks.… In that environment, gold — a safe haven — has traded sideways.” He also suggested silver has better potential, saying “while Bitcoin can easily crash, silver’s downside seems very limited.”
Schiff has long predicted Bitcoin’s downfall. In April, he warned a looming financial crisis could make “2025… the end of Bitcoin.”
Beyond Schiff, traditional economists raise additional concerns:
These criticisms don’t negate Bitcoin’s monetary design, but they add an important nuance: not everyone believes the block subsidy guarantees future wealth creation.
Let’s look at where we are:
This means the world will spend the next century fighting over the remaining 5%. And the final halving cycles are where things become interesting.

Here’s what block rewards look like from 2030 onward:
By 2048-2060, the subsidy will become trivial. Yet Bitcoin adoption will be vastly higher. Imagine a world where:
Now overlay that with a mining subsidy so tiny that producing even 0.01 BTC is a rare event.
The price discovery that follows is inevitable.
Most people think they missed Bitcoin. But the truth is the opposite:
In Bitcoin, “early” has nothing to do with price. It has everything to do with blocks, and we’re barely getting started.
Most people think “early” refers to buying Bitcoin many years ago. In reality, it’s about where we are in the block subsidy timeline. Even though Bitcoin has existed for over 15 years, we are still early in terms of remaining subsidized blocks, over 6 million of them. The block subsidy is the number of new BTC created each time miners produce a block. It started at 50 BTC in 2009 and gets cut in half every 210,000 blocks (roughly four years), a process known as “halving.” About 95% of all Bitcoin block subsidies have already been minted, even though fewer than 1 million subsidized blocks have been mined out of the planned 6.93 million. We are early in block time, not supply time. Only a small fraction of total blocks have been mined. The next century will be dominated by slow issuance and massive adoption — a very different environment from Bitcoin’s early years.