Key Takeaways
Bitcoin’s rebound above $85,000 came after tens of thousands of smaller wallets disappeared from key holding brackets, according to Santiment data, highlighting how quickly crypto markets can turn against fearful sellers.
The data shows a combined decline of 69,494 addresses holding between 0.1 and 10 BTC during the July-August shakeout, before Bitcoin reclaimed $80,000 and extended its recovery.
Now, with BTC pushing toward $87,000, the mood has reversed. Santiment’s accompanying commentary describes Bitcoin-related fear of missing out as its strongest since 2024, raising questions about whether traders chasing the breakout are replacing one crowded trade with another.
+68
The supplied figures show that the number of wallets holding between 0.1 and 1 BTC fell by 62,335. Addresses holding between 1 and 10 BTC declined by another 7,159.
Santiment interprets the contraction as evidence that smaller holders lost conviction during the downturn, leading them to reduce their exposure before prices recovered.
However, wallet counts do not map directly to individual investors. One person can control multiple addresses, while transfers, consolidation, and movements between balance brackets can change the totals without representing an outright sale.
The figures therefore support a narrower conclusion than the headline suggests: these two wallet cohorts contracted sharply. They do not independently establish that exactly 69,494 people panic-sold their Bitcoin.
Even with that qualification, the timing illustrates a familiar market pattern. Investors who reduce exposure during prolonged uncertainty can find themselves watching from the sidelines when momentum suddenly returns.
Bitcoin subsequently broke above $85,000 for the first time since January, according to the supplied commentary, as a wave of liquidations amplified the advance.
Roughly $648 million in bearish cryptocurrency positions were liquidated over 24 hours. That figure covers crypto positions broadly, rather than Bitcoin alone.
Short sellers bet on falling prices. When the market rises sufficiently, exchanges can forcibly close leveraged positions, creating buying pressure that pushes prices higher and threatens other shorts.
That feedback loop can turn an initial recovery into a much faster rally.
The commentary also points to falling oil prices as a supportive influence on risk appetite, while total cryptocurrency trading volume reportedly increased by 39%.
However, forced buying does not necessarily establish durable demand. Once the liquidation wave fades, continued gains depend more heavily on buyers willing to enter at higher prices.
The rally has also changed the language traders use online.
According to Santiment, discussion anticipating “higher” prices and expressing bullish expectations surged relative to bearish language as Bitcoin approached $87,000.
The firm characterized that shift as the strongest Bitcoin FOMO reading since 2024.

Such enthusiasm can accompany genuine momentum. It can also signal that traders increasingly expect the same outcome, leaving prices vulnerable if the market fails to deliver further gains.
Sentiment alone cannot identify a top. Bullish conditions can persist, and a crowded market can continue rising before it reverses.
Nevertheless, the contrast is striking: smaller wallet cohorts shrank during the shakeout, while optimism surged after Bitcoin had already recovered substantially.
Despite the short liquidations, open interest rose by 7.6% to approximately $156 billion.
Open interest measures outstanding derivative contracts. An increase alongside heavy liquidations suggests that traders continued to add positions as existing bets closed.
It does not, by itself, reveal whether those new positions were predominantly bullish or bearish.
The combination nevertheless matters. Rising leverage can leave the market more sensitive to abrupt price changes, particularly when sentiment becomes increasingly one-sided.

Santiment’s broader argument is that capitulation can reduce immediately available selling pressure when coins move toward holders less inclined to sell. If demand subsequently strengthens, thinner available supply can magnify the price response.
But the wallet figures alone cannot prove who absorbed those coins or how long they intend to hold them.
Bitcoin’s latest move demonstrates the cost of getting caught on the wrong side of a rapid sentiment reversal. Whether the recovery continues will depend on sustained demand after the squeeze and on how aggressively traders rebuild leveraged exposure.
For now, the same market that punished fear is testing whether renewed confidence has become excessive, too.