Home / News / Crypto / News / Carlson’s Putin Interview Divides Opinion After Vitalik Buterin Regret: What About Crypto’s Neutrality?
8 min read

Carlson’s Putin Interview Divides Opinion After Vitalik Buterin Regret: What About Crypto’s Neutrality?

Last Updated February 7, 2024 2:10 PM
Teuta Franjkovic
Last Updated February 7, 2024 2:10 PM

Key Takeaways

  • Tucker Carlson reportedly conducted an interview with Vladimir Putin in Moscow.
  • Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin shared regrets over his past interaction with Putin.
  • Journalists criticized Carlson’s claims of media bias regarding Putin’s perspective.
  • Carlson’s interview is backed by the Kremlin, aligning with his narrative of “uncovering the truth” hidden by the West.

During a recent visit to Moscow, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson reportedly conducted an interview  with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Alexei Venediktov, the ex-editor-in-chief of Echo of Moscow, a radio station known for its critical stance against the Kremlin that was shut down, shared information on X  indicating that an interview between Tucker Carlson and Russian President Vladimir Putin had indeed taken place.

“Uncensored” Putin Interview to Challenge West’s Ukraine Narrative

Venediktov’s post in Russian on Tuesday suggested that Carlson achieved his objective, stating , “As far as I understand, Tucker Carlson got what he wanted.”

This update was further disseminated by Max Seddon , the Moscow bureau chief for The Financial Times, who highlighted Venediktov’s update: “Russian journalistic gadfly Alexei Venediktov says Tucker Carlson has indeed interviewed Vladimir Putin while in Moscow.”

Tucker Carlson took to X on Tuesday afternoon to promote his upcoming interview with Putin as an opportunity for the American public to witness the “truth” about the war in Ukraine. He criticized  Western media outlets for allegedly perpetuating falsehoods about the conflict, despite not providing evidence for these claims.

Who is Tucker Carlson: Crypto Champion or Far-Right Firebrand?

Tucker Carlson, the controversial far-right pundit and former Fox News host, was let go  by the network last year due to concerns that he had become “too big for his boots.” Despite his polarizing political stance, Carlson is known for his crypto-friendly views, a common trait among many right-wing figures.

His criticism of government policies and support for pro-Trump ideologies have been well-documented. Recently, Carlson made an appearance at a business conference in Las Vegas , where he openly endorsed Bitcoin. During his talk, he emphasized  Bitcoin’s significance beyond being merely an investment asset, pointing out its potential as a mechanism to curb government overreach.

He then stated :

“The promise of Bitcoin is not just getting rich from Bitcoin. The promise of Bitcoin is you’re independent of control by the people who devalue currencies since Rome.”

When questioned about financial censorship in the U.S., particularly referencing a Bitcoin miner whose bank accounts were frozen—a scenario illustrating potential regulatory repercussions for Bitcoin investors—Carlson shared his perspective on why he thinks the U.S. government might engage in such actions.

Carlson argued  that the inherent tendency of politicians to increase their power by printing more money is a temptation that’s hard to resist over time. He posited that Bitcoin represents a viable escape from this cycle, which he views as fundamentally unjustifiable.

Regulators Fear DeFi’s Freedom, Hide Behind “Terrorist” Narrative to Control You

Carlson suggested that the portrayal of cryptocurrencies as tools predominantly used by criminals is a reflection of regulators’ apprehension towards a decentralized financial system that eludes their direct oversight. He pointed to negative remarks made by U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen about cryptocurrencies as evidence of this regulatory anxiety.

He said :

“Janet Yellen … is never going to stand up and be like, ‘I’m against Bitcoin because it would disempower me and allow the average person to have a little bit more control over his own life. She’s going to be like, ‘Terrorists use Bitcoin!’ Really, terrorists?”

Carlson depicted the escalating conflict between Bitcoin investors and central bank regulators as a critical battleground in a broader struggle for personal freedoms and sovereignty within the U.S. According to Carlson, the implications are profound, with not just global stability at risk, but the very essence of individual freedom and integrity.

Kremlin Backs “Uncensored” Look Amidst Media Bias Accusations

In a four-minute video  recorded in Moscow, Carlson highlighted the lack of American understanding regarding Putin’s reasons for invading Ukraine and his current objectives. He announced that the interview would be available on his personal website, promising it would be published “uncensored” by X’s owner, Elon Musk, though he did not specify when it would be released.

At the time of writing, the Kremlin officially confirmed  that President Vladimir Putin granted an interview to Carlson, citing Carlson’s approach as a deviation from the often one-sided reporting characteristic of many traditional Western news outlets.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov criticized  Western media for their lack of impartiality in reporting on Russia, stating that these media organizations no longer make efforts to maintain a semblance of neutrality. Consequently, Peskov mentioned that there is no longer any interest in engaging directly with such media entities.

From Hopes to Regrets – Buterin Navigating Crypto & Putin

Carlson is not the only high profile figure in the crypto community to engage with the Russian President. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, in a reflective blog post , delved into the intricate relationship between his crypto journey and international politics.

Buterin shared insights into the unintended consequences of his interactions, particularly his 2017 meeting with Putin , which he initially did not see as an endorsement of Putin’s government.

Over time, he has come to view it as an inadvertent validation of Putin’s leadership, marking a profound evolution in his understanding of the political implications of his actions. This realization sheds light on the moral dilemmas faced by tech innovators navigating the complex interplay between technology and global political dynamics.

Recently he wrote :

“Now, five years later, I finally realized that (i) I had been complicit in legitimizing a genocidal dictator, and (ii) within the crypto space too, I no longer had the luxury of sitting back and letting mystical “other people” run the show.”

Journalists Counter Claims of Media Bias on Putin and Ukraine War

Carlson’s monologue criticizing Western media for allegedly failing to present Putin’s perspective on the Ukraine conflict has elicited strong reactions from both American and Russian journalists.

Anne Applebaum, an American journalist and historian, challenged  Carlson’s claims on X, highlighting that many journalists have interviewed Putin and covered his speeches extensively. She criticized Carlson’s approach, labeling him not as a journalist but a propagandist aiding in the obscuration of autocratic corruption.

Contrary to Carlson’s assertion that Western journalists have neglected to interview Putin, figures like CNN’s Christiane Amanpour  and BBC’s Steve Rosenberg  revealed their persistent, yet unsuccessful, attempts to secure interviews with the Russian President since the onset of the conflict in Ukraine. Amanpour and Rosenberg’s comments underscore the journalistic effort to engage with Putin, contradicting Carlson’s narrative of neglect.

Additionally, Yaroslav Trofimov of the Wall Street Journal sarcastically remarked  on the supposed silence around Putin’s justifications for the invasion, pointing out that Putin’s initial announcement and subsequent speeches have been widely disseminated across global media networks.

This discourse emphasizes the complexity and contention surrounding media coverage of the Ukraine war, with Carlson’s interview with Putin being seen as part of a broader debate on journalistic access, bias, and representation in covering international conflicts.

Crypto’s Neutrality Myth: When Politics and Power Enter the Blockchain

When considering the intersection of politics, politicians, and crypto proponents, the question of crypto’s neutrality looms large. Advocates of cryptocurrency often tout its decentralized nature as a safeguard against government control and manipulation, emphasizing its potential to promote financial autonomy and privacy.

However, the involvement of political figures and entities in the crypto sphere can complicate this narrative. While some politicians embrace cryptocurrency as a tool for economic empowerment and innovation, others express concerns about its potential for facilitating illicit activities or destabilizing traditional financial systems.

The influence of political agendas and regulatory frameworks on the development and adoption of cryptocurrencies raises questions about their true neutrality. Navigating the delicate balance between the disruptive potential of crypto and its interaction with political interests remains a crucial aspect of the ongoing discourse surrounding digital currencies and their role in shaping future socioeconomic landscapes.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No