Key Takeaways
Bitcoin is often described as a scarce digital asset, but recent data suggests its scarcity may now be intensifying in a new way. According to Binance Research, Bitcoin is already operating in deflationary territory, with net inflation at roughly -0.21%. In simple terms, more bitcoin is effectively disappearing from active circulation than is being newly created.
That shift comes from an unusual imbalance as around 164,000 BTC is issued each year through mining rewards and roughly 290,000 BTC goes dormant annually.
Dormant coins are not destroyed, but they are coins that appear to have fallen out of active circulation for long periods, whether because their holders refuse to sell, have lost access to their wallets, or simply are not moving them. The result is that Bitcoin’s liquid supply may be shrinking even while the network continues to produce new coins.
At the same time, Bitcoin’s security infrastructure tells a very different story. Mining power remains heavily concentrated geographically. According to the latest Hashrate Index data for Q2 2026, the US (37.4%), Russia (16.9%), and China (12.0%) together account for about 65% of global Bitcoin hashrate.
Bitcoin has a fixed maximum supply of 21 million coins, but that does not automatically make it deflationary in day-to-day market terms. New BTC is still issued every block as miners secure the network. What changes the picture is the rate at which coins stop circulating.

If 164,000 BTC is mined in a year, but 290,000 BTC becomes dormant, then the active supply available to traders, institutions, and everyday holders is shrinking.
A useful way to think about this shift is:
Markets respond to available supply, not just theoretical supply. A bitcoin that has not moved in years may still exist on-chain, but if it is highly unlikely to be sold, it behaves almost like a removed supply.
It is tempting to interpret dormant BTC as a sign of stagnation, but that would be misleading. Dormancy often reflects conviction.
Many long-term holders treat Bitcoin less like a transactional currency and more like a strategic reserve asset.
Some dormant BTC is almost certainly lost forever, which strengthens scarcity further. But a large portion is more likely held by investors, treasuries, funds, and early adopters who are choosing not to move their coins.
In other words, Bitcoin can become more scarce even while adoption and infrastructure continue to grow.
If the supply side looks increasingly decentralized, the mining side remains more concentrated than many Bitcoin supporters would like.
Hashrate Index reports that global hashrate fell from 1,066 EH/s in Q1 2026 to 1,004 EH/s in Q2 2026, a 5.8% quarter-over-quarter decline, driven primarily by falling profitability.
Key pressures included:
The top countries by hashrate share:

Bitcoin is designed to resist centralized control, but geographic concentration introduces risk. When mining is clustered in a few countries, external factors can have outsized effects.
These include:
History shows that these risks are real. China’s mining bans and enforcement actions have repeatedly shifted global hashrate, while regional conflicts have impacted countries like Iran.
However, Bitcoin has remained resilient. When one region declines, mining activity typically relocates rather than disappears.
The concentration story is evolving. Several emerging markets are gaining share, particularly those with cheap energy and modern infrastructure.
Notable growth regions include:
These markets demonstrate that mining expansion is driven primarily by economics, especially energy costs and hardware efficiency.
The mining industry is under significant pressure. CoinShares described Q4 2025 as the toughest period since the 2024 halving.
Several factors converged:

The average cost to mine one Bitcoin rose to approximately $79,995, while revenue per unit of hashpower dropped sharply.
This has created a divide:
One of the most important shifts in 2026 is the rapid pivot toward AI and HPC infrastructure.
Key developments include:
Companies like Core Scientific, TeraWulf, and Hut 8 are increasingly becoming hybrid infrastructure providers.
This shift is driven by economics: AI workloads offer higher and more stable returns compared to mining in a low hashprice environment.
Potentially, but not immediately.
As large miners repurpose infrastructure for AI, Bitcoin mining may shift toward:
This could increase decentralization over time. However, in the short term, large players still dominate capital and hardware supply.
Bitcoin is evolving along two critical dimensions.
On one hand, it is becoming more scarce in practice. Negative net inflation suggests that liquid supply is tightening faster than expected.
On the other, mining remains geographically concentrated, with the US, Russia, and China dominating the network’s computational power.
The reality is that Bitcoin is shaped by economic forces:
Bitcoin may be becoming more deflationary, but its infrastructure is still consolidating. Whether the network becomes more decentralized from here will depend not on ideology, but on energy markets, regulation, and the economics of next-generation computing.
Yes, based on recent estimates, Bitcoin is effectively deflationary in terms of liquid supply. While new BTC is still issued (164,000 per year), a larger amount (290,000 BTC annually) is becoming dormant, resulting in negative net inflation (-0.21%). Dormant Bitcoin refers to coins that have not moved on-chain for a long period of time. This can happen because long-term holders are choosing not to sell, some coins are permanently lost due to inaccessible wallets, or institutions and treasuries are holding assets without transacting. While these coins still exist, they are effectively removed from active market circulation. When more BTC becomes dormant than is newly mined, the amount of Bitcoin available for trading decreases. This reduction in liquid supply can limit selling pressure and make prices more sensitive to changes in demand. As a result, in periods of rising demand, price movements can become more pronounced. As of Q2 2026, Bitcoin mining remains highly concentrated geographically. The United States accounts for about 37.4% of global hashrate, followed by Russia at 16.9% and China at 12.0%. Together, these three countries control roughly 65% of the network’s total computational power.