Studies: Panicking into Recession Could Kill More Than Coronavirus

COVID-19 is deadly, and it’s smart to keep coronavirus from spreading. But even more people could die if we panic the world into recession.

coronavirus, global pandemic

The coronavirus pandemic is not to be ignored, but if it leads to recession, it could cause more widespread damage. Leaders urging calm shouldn’t be scolded. | Image: Frederic J. BROWN / AFP

  • The U.S. federal and state governments, along with private organizations, are taking drastic measures to prevent coronavirus from spreading.
  • There’s an outcry against anyone perceived as downplaying the pandemic, or not taking it seriously enough, including Donald Trump.
  • It’s smart to take reasonable measures to prevent coronavirus from spreading. But studies show a recession could be even more deadly.

The White House instituted a travel ban on all incoming flights from Europe Wednesday. That same day the State of California issued an order for “non-essential” gatherings to be canceled or postponed. And for all people to maintain a distance of six feet from each other in public places. Meanwhile, the NBA suspended its entire season after a player tested positive for coronavirus. Italy has tightened its countrywide lockdown.

CNN’s senior political analyst said Wednesday:

If you thought coronavirus was no big deal or if you thought it was going to go away, wake up. Your life is about to change.

It’s good to take precautions against coronavirus, but locking down the entire world to this degree is absolutely blind panic. It could easily cause more devastation and death than coronavirus itself would. That’s because recessions are as deadly as pandemics.

Recession Can Be More Deadly Than Coronavirus

Coronavirus has exacted a devastating economic toll but the global reaction to it might very well plunge the world economy into a recession.

The day after Donald Trump announced the European travel ban, the Dow Jones crashed harder than any other day in 33 years.

Jack Allen-Reynolds, senior Europe economist at Capital Economics, says a recession looms over Italy because of the coronavirus lockdown.

A startling unanimity of American CFOs were warning of a recession ahead before they even knew coronavirus would play a role in it. Now because of coronavirus, investors are facing the reality that a global recession looks inevitable.

And that could easily kill more people than coronavirus.

If the economy craters, consider how much wealth will be destroyed. As a result funding for life saving treatment of other diseases and causes of death will dry up.

A 2016 study by researchers at Imperial College London found that the last global financial crisis caused 500,000 cancer deaths worldwide between 2008 and 2010. They found a correlation between each percentage increase in unemployment, and an uptick in cancer deaths.

Another study in 2014 by University of Oxford researchers found over 10,000 suicides tied to the Great Recession in the U.S., Canada and Europe:

There has been a substantial rise in suicides during the recession, considerably more than we would have expected based on previous trends.

It appears the financial pressures of recession pushed already at risk populations of depressed people over the edge into despair, hopelessness and suicide. Keep that in mind when you hear people getting sanctimonious about lives lost because the government is not doing enough to contain coronavirus.

Voices for a Measured Response Are Valid

The two studies referenced above found 510,000 deaths directly tied to the Great Recession. So far coronavirus has claimed 4,718 lives, and new cases in China are on the decline.

We must take the voices like President Trump’s– urging a calm and measured response– seriously. We don’t have to agree with him on the proper extent of the response, but we could blunder right into a much deadlier situation than coronavirus if we panic.

It’s not smart to reflexively write off anyone like Donald Trump or Elon Musk, who says we might be overreacting. Much of the mainstream media has characterized Trump’s approach as a cynical ploy with political considerations in mind.

But shutting down the world to protect a small percentage of at-risk individuals is damaging the livelihood of millions. It has already destroyed trillions in wealth. Is it so far-fetched to suggest we’re panicking and causing more death and destruction than coronavirus would have?

Perhaps instead of draconian measures that canvass the entire population as if coronavirus were a threat with a bell curve distribution (which it’s not), at-risk individuals could make a decision for themselves whether they want to take the risk of going to public places. And the rest of us could be free to make that same choice.

Then 500,000 more people might not have to die in the next recession.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of

Last modified: September 25, 2020 8:42 PM
Markets Contributor for CCN living in Nashville, Tennessee. Bachelor of Business Administration from Belmont University in 2009 (majored in Entrepreneurship). Organized Senator Rand Paul's first and second online fundraisers in 2009. Roving editor for the Independent Voter Network since 2013. Email me | Link up with me on LinkedIn | Follow Me on Twitter (followed by: fmr Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), fmr NM Gov. Gary Johnson, and Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY))
Previous Twitch Will Sink If They Expect People Like Dr DisRespect to Carry Them Next The Dow Is Soaring – Here’s Why the Stock Market Is Cheering Trump