Key Takeaways
Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan has proposed a regulatory framework that could allow Wall Street institutions to operate on blockchain infrastructure without requiring the underlying network to register as a traditional financial exchange.
Speaking on Bloomberg’s Odd Lots podcast on Oct. 15, Yan argued that regulatory responsibilities should fall on companies operating financial markets rather than the blockchain supporting those activities.
His proposal comes as US regulators examine how decentralized derivatives platforms could operate within existing financial rules.
“The regulation sits at the layer where there are controls, and indeed the deployers are the ones that exercise these controls,” Yan said.
Hyperliquid operates a blockchain-based trading ecosystem best known for perpetual futures, derivatives contracts that allow traders to speculate on asset prices without expiration dates.
The platform currently restricts US users from accessing its perpetual futures markets.
Yan’s proposed approach separates the underlying layer-1 blockchain from businesses that build trading products on top of it.
Under this structure, financial institutions would remain responsible for customer verification, trading surveillance and regulatory reporting.
The blockchain itself would function as shared infrastructure rather than a regulated exchange operator.
“We’re not trying to displace anything,” Yan said, adding that the technology could benefit existing financial market operators.
The proposal is already gaining practical relevance.
In September, Kraken parent Payward announced plans to offer US investors regulated perpetual futures using Hyperliquid’s technology.
The proposed arrangement involves Bitnomial Exchange, a Commodity Futures Trading Commission-regulated exchange, alongside Bitnomial Clearinghouse and NinjaTrader Clearing.
The products would use Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 infrastructure, which enables independent developers to launch perpetual futures markets.
However, the planned offerings remain subject to regulatory approval.
The arrangement illustrates how established financial firms could use decentralized technology while maintaining traditional compliance responsibilities.
Yan’s comments arrive amid broader efforts to establish rules for cryptocurrency derivatives in the United States.
On Oct. 5, the CFTC released an advance notice of proposed rulemaking exploring new regulatory categories for crypto asset transactions and markets.
The proposals could reshape how leveraged cryptocurrency products are supervised, although they do not establish Yan’s preferred regulatory distinction.
The central question is whether regulators will treat public blockchain infrastructure differently from the businesses that operate markets on it.
Supporters argue that separating infrastructure from financial operators could encourage institutional adoption without eliminating investor protections.
However, determining who controls trading systems, manages risks, and bears responsibility when markets fail remains a significant challenge.
For Hyperliquid, regulatory clarity could provide a route into the US institutional market. Whether Wall Street adopts that infrastructure will depend on both regulatory approval and the ability to meet established financial safeguards