Key Takeaways
For over a decade, Ripple and Stellar have built their entire value propositions around a single, demonstrable failure in the global financial system: cross-border payments are slow, expensive, opaque, and structurally dependent on a chain of correspondent banks that extract fees at every link.
XRP and XLM each offered a version of the same answer, a blockchain-native bridge asset that could settle international transfers in seconds at near-zero cost, without requiring a trusted intermediary at the center.
On May 27, 2026, the Bank for International Settlements disclosed that Project Agorá, a two-year experiment involving seven central banks, the Institute of International Finance, and more than 40 private financial institutions, including JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, BBVA, Visa, and Mastercard, had been concluded.
The project delivered a prototype demonstrating that tokenized commercial bank deposits can be successfully combined with the trust and safety of tokenized central bank reserves on a shared platform, enabling atomic multi-currency settlement of wholesale cross-border payments around the clock.
That conclusion does not make XRP or XLM obsolete. What it does is force a cleaner, more honest assessment of where each token’s use case actually holds, and where central bank infrastructure is now moving to cover the same ground.
Understanding what Agorá proved requires understanding what actually makes cross-border payments slow today.
The current cross-border payment system suffers from slow transfer speeds, high costs, and limited transparency due to its structure of routing through multiple intermediaries.
Agorá examined how to address these inefficiencies by tokenizing central bank reserves and commercial bank deposits and processing them on a common distributed ledger platform.
The project implemented a structure that processes AML checks, financial sanctions screening, and fraud detection in parallel, then locks the funds just before settlement to complete transactions within seconds.
Atomic settlement is cited as a core technology of the project. By applying an all-or-nothing structure in which every step in the transaction chain is executed or canceled simultaneously, the system minimizes settlement risk while enabling 24-hour round-the-clock operations.
By leveraging smart contracts, the shared platform allows financial institutions to embed workflow logic, compliance requirements, and conditional payment triggers directly into transactions, reducing reconciliation burdens, manual intervention, and operational frictions that are key sources of delay and cost in today’s cross-border system.
Seven central banks participated: the Banque de France, representing the Eurosystem; the Bank of Japan; the Bank of Korea; the Bank of Mexico; the Swiss National Bank; the Bank of England; and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Settlement across all seven currency areas was confirmed in testing.
The New York Fed, Bank of England, and Bank of Japan now plan to move from simulations to testing real-value transactions.
That step from prototype to live capital marks the transition from proof-of-concept work to infrastructure with genuine deployment implications.
Ripple spent years arguing that blockchain-native atomic settlement was the correct architecture for cross-border payments. Project Agorá agreed with that diagnosis and built exactly what Ripple described, except using tokenized central bank reserves rather than XRP as the settlement asset.
That creates a genuine challenge for XRP’s bridge asset narrative at the wholesale institutional level. The bridge asset use case exists specifically because there is no direct settlement path between two currencies. Agora’s shared ledger creates a direct multi-currency settlement path using tokenized reserves, thereby removing one of the core conditions that made a neutral bridge asset necessary.
However, Ripple has been repositioning ahead of exactly this scenario.
Notably, XRP functions as a bridge asset for liquidity and interoperability while RLUSD acts as a unit of account and settlement currency, a division of labor that makes more sense in a world where central bank tokenization is moving to cover direct institutional settlement corridors, leaving the liquidity routing function for illiquid currency pairs and emerging market corridors to a neutral bridge asset.
The honest version of XRP’s position post-Agorá is this: wholesale settlement between major reserve currency pairs may increasingly move to central bank-managed shared ledgers.
Cross-border payments involving illiquid corridors, markets without central bank tokenization infrastructure, and retail remittance flows remain a territory where XRP’s speed and liquidity depth offer genuine value that no Project Agorá prototype currently covers.
Stellar’s value proposition has always been oriented differently from XRP’s. Where Ripple targets wholesale institutional settlement, Stellar’s mission centers on financial inclusion, remittances, and underserved markets where traditional correspondent banking is either absent or prohibitively expensive.
Project Agorá is explicitly a wholesale payments project. Its focus is on wholesale cross-border transactions between major financial institutions across reserve currency jurisdictions.
Retail remittances, microfinance corridors, and payments to unbanked populations in Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, or Southeast Asia are entirely outside its scope.
Central banks moving to tokenized reserve settlement in USD, EUR, JPY, and GBP corridors does not directly address the Bangladesh-to-Philippines remittance corridor or the small-business payment flows between African markets that Stellar targets.
That structural distinction gives Stellar a different kind of exposure.
At the same time, the Stellar Development Foundation has been positioning the network as complementary to CBDCs rather than a direct competitor.
That strategy gained further momentum after the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) and the Stellar Development Foundation announced plans to enable the tokenization of DTC-custodied assets on the Stellar network, with launch targets set for the first half of 2027.
The partnership aligns with DTCC’s broader multi-chain strategy and strengthens Stellar’s positioning within institutional tokenization infrastructure.
Cross-border payment flows are projected to grow from roughly $190 trillion in 2023 to nearly $290 trillion by 2030, with business-to-business transfers accounting for the largest share. No single infrastructure will carry all of that volume.
A Project Agorá-type solution could support a range of use cases beyond wholesale cross-border payments, including tokenized assets and capital markets transactions.
That ambition is real, but the path from a seven-currency prototype to global deployment across all payment corridors involves years of technical, legal, and interoperability work that remains entirely unfinished.
SWIFT, Agorá, RLUSD, XRP, and XLM are not converging on a single winner. They are each carving out portions of a market too large and too fragmented for any one architecture to dominate.
What Project Agorá’s conclusion does change is the competitive framing: the institutional wholesale corridor that XRP once targeted as its primary opportunity now has a central-bank-backed alternative in active development.
That shifts Ripple’s differentiation toward tokenization infrastructure, stablecoin settlement, and emerging-market liquidity, areas where the company has spent 3 years and billions of dollars building a position that Agorá’s prototype does not replicate.
The pressure is real. The displacement is not immediate.
Project Agorá is a BIS-led experiment involving major central banks and private financial institutions testing tokenized cross-border payment infrastructure. The project challenges XRP’s wholesale settlement narrative, but XRP and XLM may still play roles in remittances, emerging markets, and liquidity routing. The project showed that tokenized reserves and deposits can support atomic, 24/7 cross-border settlement with lower friction and fewer intermediaries. Participants included the Bank of England, Bank of Japan, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Swiss National Bank, Banque de France, Bank of Korea, and Bank of Mexico.