Key Takeaways
Silver prices surged above the $110–$118 per ounce range in late January 2026, marking one of the strongest rallies in modern precious-metals trading.
The move has triggered speculation that large financial institutions are hoarding physical silver, while at the same time cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP have lagged behind metals.
This article explains what is confirmed by market data, what remains unproven, and how this divergence between metals and crypto fits into the broader macro picture.
Silver accelerated sharply through the final quarter of 2025, then extended gains in January 2026 alongside a broader rally in precious metals. Market reports during January 23–28, 2026 showed spot prices moving through $110 per ounce and approaching $118 on intraday trading.
Notably, the rally is part of a record-setting run across gold, silver, and platinum, driven by strong investor demand and tight supply expectations at the start of the year.
The speed of the move attracted heavy futures trading and ETF inflows, increasing volatility and reinforcing upward momentum.
One of the main data points behind claims of “hoarding” is falling silver inventory on the U.S. futures exchange.
According to exchange data cited by market reports:
These declines are significant and indicate physical drawdowns from exchange vaults.
However, inventory declines do not identify:
Metal can leave COMEX vaults because it is transferred to London or Asia, used by industrial buyers, or reallocated between custodial categories. Declining inventories signal market tightness, but they do not prove deliberate hoarding by banks.
While U.S. inventories fell, London data told a different story.
LBMA vault statistics for December 2025 showed:
This suggests that some silver was likely moving between storage hubs, not vanishing from global supply. If banks were broadly locking away metal, both U.S. and London vault data would likely show synchronized declines, which was not the case at year-end.
There is no official reserve data showing central banks accumulating large silver positions.
Modern central bank reserves primarily consist of:
Silver is not widely used as a reserve asset in current monetary systems, and major custodians such as the Bank of England store gold, not silver, for official reserves. Claims of central bank silver hoarding are not supported by IMF or national reserve disclosures.
Large financial institutions known as bullion banks:
This means banks may appear in vault statistics, but most metal is typically:
There is no audited public evidence that banks are systematically removing silver from circulation to restrict supply. While institutions are major participants in metals markets, that alone does not confirm hoarding behavior.
Independent industry research groups and metals analysts have reported that:
Because silver is both an investment and industrial metal, sudden increases in investment demand can strain available above-ground stocks even if mine production is stable.
This supply-demand imbalance provides a more direct explanation for rising prices than unproven hoarding claims.
Despite the rally, not all analysts are bullish.
In January 2026, Marko Kolanovic, former JPMorgan chief market strategist, warned that silver could suffer a decline of up to 50% within a year if speculative excess unwinds.
His concerns focused on:
Kolanovic argued that silver’s rally resembles past commodity spikes that later corrected sharply once demand normalized or financial conditions tightened.
This highlights that current price levels may reflect market stress and speculation, not only physical scarcity.
While silver and gold reached record levels, cryptocurrencies did not match the same performance in January 2026.
During the same period:
Several macro factors explain the divergence:
When markets turn cautious, investors often rotate toward:
Crypto is still treated by many institutions as a risk asset, not a defensive one.
Crypto markets tend to perform best when:
Metals, by contrast, benefit more directly from:
Precious-metal ETFs recorded stronger inflows than crypto products in early 2026, reflecting shifting portfolio allocations rather than technology-specific issues.
This does not imply a long-term decline for crypto, but it does show that in the current macro environment, traditional safe-haven assets are capturing defensive capital first.
Silver’s surge above $118 in January 2026 reflects a market experiencing real supply tightness, strong industrial demand, and aggressive investment flows, amplified by speculative momentum in futures markets. While exchange inventories have fallen, global vault data does not support the claim that banks are secretly hoarding silver on a large scale.
At the same time, cryptocurrencies have lagged as investors shift toward traditional safe-haven assets during a period of macro uncertainty. Analysts remain divided on whether silver’s rally is sustainable, with warnings from former JPMorgan strategist Marko Kolanovic highlighting the risk of a sharp correction if speculative pressure fades.
The current environment is best understood as a high-volatility commodity cycle, not a confirmed institutional supply lock-up.
No verified public data confirms large-scale silver hoarding by central banks or commercial banks. Modern central bank reserve disclosures focus on gold and foreign currencies, not silver. While bullion banks store and trade large volumes of silver, most of that metal is typically held on behalf of clients, ETFs, or as part of normal market-making and hedging operations, not as long-term proprietary stockpiles. COMEX inventories reflect silver stored specifically in U.S. exchange-approved vaults for futures settlement. Metal can leave these vaults because it is shipped to industrial users, transferred to London or Asian vault systems, or reclassified between “registered” and “eligible” categories. A decline in COMEX stocks indicates tighter deliverable supply for futures contracts, but it does not mean global silver supply has disappeared. In early 2026, investors shifted toward traditional safe-haven assets such as gold and silver due to macroeconomic uncertainty and geopolitical risks. Cryptocurrencies are still treated by many institutional investors as risk-sensitive assets that perform better when liquidity is expanding. As defensive positioning increased, capital flowed more strongly into precious metals than into digital assets. Marko Kolanovic, former JPMorgan chief market strategist, warned in January 2026 that silver’s rapid price rise showed signs of speculative excess. His concern was that momentum-driven trading and crowded positioning could reverse if financial conditions tighten or demand cools, potentially leading to a sharp correction even if long-term fundamentals remain supportive.