The embattled exchange called the ruling a “victory” and insinuates that the case will end up going nowhere. Bitfinex has already admitted that as much as $850 million evaporated from its coffers while Tether Limited has publicly confessed to only partially backing the world’s oldest stablecoin.
Under the order, Tether and Bitfinex can continue business as usual, but Tether Limited may not make any loans to Bitfinex. Moreover, while the injunction has been modified, Bitfinex and Tether are called on to cooperate with the investigation to the best of their ability.
“Having now heard both sides of the story, the Court grants Respondents’ motion in part and denies it in part for the reasons set forth on the record at a hearing on May 6, 2019 and as summarized herein. In a nutshell, the Court finds that Petitioner is entitled to the Order requiring Respondent to promptly produce evidence, but that the preliminary injunction contained in the Order should be modified.”
Judge Joel M. Cohen notes that a vital part of the attorney general’s investigation rests on the idea that Bitfinex secured a line of credit from Tether. Tether will not be allowed to loan any money to Bitfinex while the investigation is ongoing, and both companies need to provide information about that situation. While stipulating that New York law doesn’t give the AG with carte blanche, the court does uphold the AG’s right to investigate under New York business law.
“[T]he Court finds that Petitioner has made a sufficient showing to warrant a targeted preliminary injunction preventing Respondents from continuing to let dollars flow out of Tether’s reserves via the type of extraordinary transaction that triggered Petitioner’s concern.”
Moreover, while noting that Bitfinex denies the AG’s characterization of its relationship with Tether, the order more or less refutes the notion that the government has no authority over how such companies do business.
Bitfinex believes that the investigation is a dead end. The stance smacks of the “no collusion” mantra of Donald Trump and his supporters. The firm claims it is being wrongly investigated and seems bitter about having voluntarily cooperated with authorities previously:
“The New York Attorney General’s office has sought to proceed ex parte against us and in bad faith, notwithstanding our previous, historical, and voluntary co-operation with them. We will vigorously defend against any action by the New York Attorney General’s office, and we remain committed, as ever, to protecting our customers, our business, and our community against their meritless claims.”
Part of the problem with Bitfinex and Tether’s behavior is that investors were not previously aware of the unusual dealings. Whatever the outcome, Bitfinex and Tether both find themselves in the crosshairs of one of the least-friendly-to-crypto governments in the U.S. Despite Bitfinex’s apparent confidence, the effect of this judgment amounts to a mild annoyance for the NY Attorney General.
This article was edited by Gerelyn Terzo.
Last modified: May 17, 2019 19:11 UTC