Meet the Top 101 in Crypto
News
2 min read

US Crypto Czar David Sacks Faces Conflict of Interest Allegations Over Strategic Reserve Altcoin Picks

Published 03 March 2025
Prashant Jha
Authors
Edited by Insha Zia

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. crypto czar David Sacks faces conflict of interest allegations over his indirect Bitwise investment.
  • Critics question whether Sacks influenced the selection of altcoins for the strategic reserve.
  • Sacks says he sold his crypto holdings before taking office, but his ties to Bitwise remain a concern.

Donald Trump’s announcement of a U.S. crypto strategic reserve sent digital asset prices soaring, but it also raised questions about potential conflicts of interest at the highest levels of government.

At the center of the controversy is David Sacks, the White House’s first-ever crypto czar, who is accused of influencing the reserve’s asset selection.

Sacks’ Bitwise Investment Raises Concerns

While Sacks insists he no longer owns cryptocurrencies, reports have surfaced linking his venture firm, Craft Ventures, to Bitwise Invest—one of the largest crypto index fund providers.

Bitwise has been a Craft Ventures portfolio company since at least 2017, with Sacks listed as a key investor.

The company’s crypto index funds hold significant amounts of Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), XRP, and Cardano (ADA)—the exact five assets Trump included in the reserve.

While the reserve still requires congressional approval, the market reaction has led to accusations that Sacks and Bitwise had advance knowledge of the plan.

Skepticism Grows Over Altcoin Choices

The crypto industry remains divided over the reserve’s composition.

Some, including Bitcoin maximalists like Peter Schiff, argue that a U.S. reserve should be Bitcoin-only, given its dominant market position and status as the most decentralized asset.

Others believe the inclusion of altcoins introduces unnecessary risk.

Analysts have pointed out that ADA and XRP, while multi-billion-dollar ecosystems, lack the institutional adoption of other top assets.

On-chain investigator ZachXBT highlighted that neither token has native stablecoin issuance from major players like Circle, Tether, or Paxos—often seen as a benchmark for legitimacy.

While Sacks has denied any wrongdoing, the controversy isn’t likely to fade soon.

The crypto community continues to dig into his past statements, with some resurfacing old tweets that appear to contradict his current stance.

Meanwhile, with the strategic reserve still awaiting formal approval, its final composition—and the role of government officials in shaping it—will remain under close scrutiny.

Prashant Jha

Prashant Jha is a seasoned crypto journalist based in Delhi, India, with a Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science Engineering. Passionate about the evolving world of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, he has been a dedicated voice in the industry since 2018. Prashant’s expertise lies in regulatory reporting, where he unravels complex legal and financial developments with clarity and precision. Before joining CCN in 2024, he honed his craft at Cointelegraph, establishing himself as a trusted name in crypto journalism.

His coverage spans major industry events, including the high-profile collapses of FTX, Three Arrows Capital (3AC), and LUNA, offering readers insightful analyses of their regulatory and market implications. Prashant’s technical background enables him to bridge the gap between intricate blockchain technology and its real-world applications, making his work accessible to novices and experts.

Beyond his professional pursuits, Prashant is an avid music enthusiast, often exploring diverse genres to unwind. A sports lover, he has a particular passion for cricket and frequently engages in discussions about the game. His multifaceted interests and sharp journalistic instincts make him a valuable contributor to CCN, where he continues shaping the crypto landscape's narrative.

Related

Survey Icon
Help us improve
1 of 4
Is this your first time here?
What brought you here today?
What are you most interested in?
Would you be interested in:
Thank you icon
Thank you for your feedback!
DMCA.com Protection Status