US Crypto Czar David Sacks Faces Conflict of Interest Allegations Over Strategic Reserve Altcoin Picks
Key Takeaways
- U.S. crypto czar David Sacks faces conflict of interest allegations over his indirect Bitwise investment.
- Critics question whether Sacks influenced the selection of altcoins for the strategic reserve.
- Sacks says he sold his crypto holdings before taking office, but his ties to Bitwise remain a concern.
Donald Trump’s announcement of a U.S. crypto strategic reserve sent digital asset prices soaring, but it also raised questions about potential conflicts of interest at the highest levels of government.
At the center of the controversy is David Sacks, the White House’s first-ever crypto czar, who is accused of influencing the reserve’s asset selection.
Sacks’ Bitwise Investment Raises Concerns
While Sacks insists he no longer owns cryptocurrencies, reports have surfaced linking his venture firm, Craft Ventures, to Bitwise Invest—one of the largest crypto index fund providers.
Bitwise has been a Craft Ventures portfolio company since at least 2017, with Sacks listed as a key investor.
The company’s crypto index funds hold significant amounts of Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), XRP, and Cardano (ADA)—the exact five assets Trump included in the reserve.
While the reserve still requires congressional approval, the market reaction has led to accusations that Sacks and Bitwise had advance knowledge of the plan.
Skepticism Grows Over Altcoin Choices
The crypto industry remains divided over the reserve’s composition.
Some, including Bitcoin maximalists like Peter Schiff, argue that a U.S. reserve should be Bitcoin-only, given its dominant market position and status as the most decentralized asset.
Others believe the inclusion of altcoins introduces unnecessary risk.
Analysts have pointed out that ADA and XRP, while multi-billion-dollar ecosystems, lack the institutional adoption of other top assets.
On-chain investigator ZachXBT highlighted that neither token has native stablecoin issuance from major players like Circle, Tether, or Paxos—often seen as a benchmark for legitimacy.
While Sacks has denied any wrongdoing, the controversy isn’t likely to fade soon.
The crypto community continues to dig into his past statements, with some resurfacing old tweets that appear to contradict his current stance.
Meanwhile, with the strategic reserve still awaiting formal approval, its final composition—and the role of government officials in shaping it—will remain under close scrutiny.
