Key Takeaways
Bitcoin’s reliance on Strategy and its Chairman, Michael Saylor, is drawing fresh scrutiny after a recent Bloomberg report suggested that the company’s aggressive accumulation strategy now accounts for a significant share of its overall market activity.
The report has prompted criticism from Bitcoin loyalists who have labeled Saylor a “risk,” arguing that his aggressive buying is placing too much reliance on a single corporate buyer.
Bloomberg reported last week that Strategy accounted for roughly 12% of all Bitcoin trading activity over the past three weeks, citing TD Cowen managing director Lance Vitanza.
According to the report, the company’s presence has at times exceeded 20% of total market volume in certain weeks.
The report also cited Markus Thielen, chief executive officer of 10x Research, who argued that traditional demand indicators — including spot Bitcoin ETF inflows, futures open interest, and stablecoin activity — have not accelerated meaningfully into 2026.
“This suggests that the current wave of demand is being driven less by organic market participation and more by financial engineering,” Thielen told Bloomberg.
Bloomberg further noted that flows into US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds, which helped drive the 2024 rally, have slowed considerably.
The report added that Bitcoin miners, once viewed as long-term holders, are increasingly selling newly mined coins to fund transitions into AI infrastructure businesses.
Bloomberg also raised concerns about what could happen if Strategy’s acquisition engine slowed or faltered.
Strategy currently holds roughly 843,700 BTC, with an average purchase price near $75,700.
The publication warned that any sharp decline in Bitcoin’s price could pressure both Strategy’s balance sheet and the company’s ability to continue raising capital.
The article sparked strong reactions across the crypto community, with some Bitcoin holders openly describing Strategy itself as a growing systemic risk.
Crypto podcaster and author Tony Edward wrote on X that the situation was “not good” and argued that Strategy’s scale could eventually create a “too big to fail” scenario.
“I’m a BTC holder and see Strategy as a risk,” Edward wrote.
“If Strategy blows up, we may have a too big to fail moment where the government comes in to bail him out.”
Other users were even more critical of Saylor’s influence over the market and the company’s aggressive capital-raising model.
“Saylor is Bitcoin kryptonite. Your worst Bitcoin enemy,” one X user wrote in response to bullish commentary surrounding Strategy.
Adding: “Mass dilution, unlimited supply. ‘Financially engineered’ Fomo ‘buying the top forever.’”
Another user criticized what they described as excessive hype around Saylor.
“Bro, he knows something when BTC is at 120k. Then he ‘knows something’ again when BTC is at 116k and again at 90k,” the user wrote.
Despite the criticism, Saylor remains one of Bitcoin’s most vocal advocates and continues to divide opinion across the crypto industry.
For supporters, Strategy’s relentless accumulation demonstrates long-term conviction in Bitcoin as a treasury reserve asset.
Meanwhile, critics argue that the company’s leverage-heavy model introduces systemic risks into the market.
However, not everyone agrees that Strategy’s purchases are powerful enough to influence Bitcoin’s price materially.
Bitcoin commentator and author Adam Livingston also argued that Strategy’s purchases represent only a small fraction of overall trading activity.
“Strategy just bought about 25,000 coins,” Livingston wrote on X.
“25,000 BTC is about 0.82% of 3.04 million BTC weekly spot volume,” he added.
Livingston argued that the sheer scale of global Bitcoin trading makes it difficult for any single buyer to move prices significantly in the short term.
On Monday, Saylor posted on X: “Looking forward to Bitcoin Summer.”
The comment triggered another wave of reactions from supporters and critics alike.
Popular X account The Bitcoin Therapist responded by claiming Saylor was operating with “asymmetric information” and was “engineering the greatest trade of all time.”
Others quickly pushed back against the growing cult-like narrative surrounding the Strategy chairman.
“Bro. Please stop with your fomo hype mania,” one user replied.
Another user argued that repeated bullish calls from major Bitcoin personalities had damaged trust within the market following recent volatility.
“The trust that came with Trump is gone now,” the user wrote. “You won’t see a new ATH anytime soon.”