Key Takeaways
Nearly a third of Bitcoin’s issued supply is held by public keys already visible on the blockchain, according to figures shared by Glassnode co-founder Rafael Schultze-Kraft, putting the scale of a potential future migration into sharper focus.
Schultze-Kraft said 6.26 million BTC, or 31.2% of supply, falls into this category.
The share has climbed from 24.8% in early 2021, returning to levels last seen in 2016.
The figures measure public-key exposure, rather than stolen funds or compromised wallets. They nevertheless highlight how address practices could shape Bitcoin’s preparedness for future cryptographic threats.
+68
The largest source of exposure is address reuse, accounting for approximately 4.33 million BTC, according to Schultze-Kraft.
Some Bitcoin output types initially conceal public keys behind hashes. Spending reveals the relevant key, leaving any remaining or subsequently received coins associated with that same key exposed under Glassnode’s methodology.
Another approximately 1.94 million BTC is exposed through script types that make public keys visible by design. Schultze-Kraft’s breakdown includes 1.71 million BTC in early pay-to-public-key (P2PK) outputs and 222,000 BTC in Taproot outputs.
Around 1.10 million BTC within the P2PK category is attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator. That attribution remains an estimate, rather than confirmed ownership.
Taproot presents a different case: its output key is visible from the outset. Consequently, moving funds to a fresh address does not necessarily conceal their public key; the destination’s script type also matters.
Since Glassnode’s May report, exposed supply has increased by 222,000 BTC, while total issued supply grew by 64,000 BTC, Schultze-Kraft said.
That gap indicates that changing wallet usage and output composition are expanding the exposed balance beyond Bitcoin’s newly mined supply.
Exchanges account for 1.79 million BTC held behind visible public keys, representing 57% of their identified balances.
That proportion has increased from 55% in May to 39% at the beginning of 2021. Exchanges contributed 123,000 BTC to the increase in exposed supply since May.
The figures vary substantially across platforms. Schultze-Kraft reported exposure of 10% for Coinbase, 83% for Binance, and 100% for Bitfinex. Seven of the 15 largest exchange balances exceeded 99%.

Among other tracked entities, Fidelity held approximately 375,000 BTC with 2% exposed. Grayscale’s share stood at 49%, Revolut’s at 99%, and Robinhood’s at 100%.
Identified holdings of the US, UK, and El Salvador governments showed 0% exposure.
Schultze-Kraft emphasized that these percentages describe address usage, not a security ranking or solvency assessment. The entity figures cover only labeled addresses, limiting conclusions about an institution’s complete holdings.
The update followed Ethereum researcher Justin Drake’s call for the industry to plan for “bunker mode,” including a controlled migration toward fresh addresses whose public keys remain concealed behind hashes.
The quantum concern is that a sufficiently capable computer running Shor’s algorithm could recover private keys from exposed public keys. That remains a conditional threat, with the timing and feasibility uncertain.
Keeping keys hidden reduces exposure while funds remain unspent. It does not provide complete post-quantum protection: spending can reveal the key before a transaction confirms, creating a separate attack window.
Migration also depends on access. Coins whose private keys are lost cannot be voluntarily moved, while inactive holders may never participate.
Glassnode’s growing tally therefore measures both an address-management issue active custodians can address and a legacy problem that could require broader protocol decisions. It establishes the scale of preparation without establishing a deadline for action.