Key Takeaways
For years, Bitcoin (BTC) has often been hailed as “digital gold,” a modern-day safe haven immune to Wall Street’s turbulence.
However, when markets shake, dreams meet reality—and not always in the way crypto investors expect .
As geopolitical tensions rise and economic uncertainty deepens, the actual test for Bitcoin’s independence from traditional finance is unfolding.
On April 4, Bitcoin seemed ready to break free from its historic link with tech stocks.
While the Nasdaq tumbled 5%, Bitcoin held steady and edged slightly higher, staying around $83,000.
For a moment, it looked like the long-awaited “decoupling” had arrived.
But a single outlier event doesn’t change a deeply ingrained trend.
Within days, the correlation between Bitcoin and the Nasdaq snapped back to its usual 70%, signaling that the cryptocurrency is still closely tied to the tech-driven mood of the market.
The period since April 2, following President Donald Trump’s announcement of new global tariffs, has been tough for both Bitcoin and traditional markets.
Bitcoin dropped 2.3%, while the Nasdaq and S&P 500 fell 7.3% and 7%, respectively. Meanwhile, gold surged 6.2%, reminding everyone of its classic safe-haven status.
Yet not everyone is writing off Bitcoin. In a recent letter to investors, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink warned that if the U.S. cannot rein in its deficits, the dollar’s dominance could erode, opening the door for digital assets to play a central role.
Fink’s view is a long-term bet. In the short run, however, gold is king for BlackRock’s CEO—and Bitcoin’s decoupling from traditional markets remains a story for another day.
Furthermore, a new analysis from JPMorgan’s Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou delivers a blunt verdict: investors are still flocking to gold, not Bitcoin, in times of macroeconomic uncertainty.
Gold ETFs attracted $21.1 billion in net inflows during the first quarter of 2025, while speculative buying in gold futures increased sharply.
Bitcoin , by contrast, saw speculative interest wane, and even though bitcoin ETFs managed net inflows of over $1 billion, they pale next to the surge in gold investments.
As JPMorgan puts it, Bitcoin “did not benefit from the flows into safe havens that supported gold,“ highlighting the asset’s still-uncertain role in investors’ defensive strategies.