Author of the book ‘Mastering Bitcoin’ and noted bitcoin advocate Andreas Antonopoulos believes that a Bitcoin ETF is imminent. However, he insists that the long-term implication of such fund will do more harm than good for the original cryptocurrency. Intermediary Bitcoin ownership Antonopoulos described an…
Author of the book ‘Mastering Bitcoin’ and noted bitcoin advocate Andreas Antonopoulos believes that a Bitcoin ETF is imminent. However, he insists that the long-term implication of such fund will do more harm than good for the original cryptocurrency.
Antonopoulos described an exchange traded fund(ETF) as a fund that has a custodian or a manager who creates a financial instrument that can be traded like a stock but in the actual sense of it, it isn’t a stock. So for a Bitcoin ETF, this fund is expected to hold Bitcoin, and then sell shares in the Bitcoin reserve that represent the price of Bitcoin.
This system of investment allows people to buy the eventual shares as ‘stocks’ through their regular brokers, and traded on the stock market. Practically, in this case the investors do not hold or own actual Bitcoins. They simply own shares of Bitcoins owned and held by the custodian. So essentially, it only provides opportunities for market practitioners to speculate on Bitcoin price without actually holding it.
Antonopoulos acknowledges the sudden impact of ETF in situations where they have been applied in the past. There is usually an immediate surge in price as a result of such ETFs due to the fact that it opens up the market and makes it more accessible to investors. However, such situations exposes the market to manipulation by market makers as have been insinuated in the past.
Contrary to the popular perception of an ETF as a positive development for Bitcoin, probably due to the hope of an eventual price boom, Antonopoulos sees it as a terrible thing for the cryptocurrency. This comes from the long term expectations as to how an ETF will affect Bitcoin.
One of the major reasons why Antonopoulos thinks that an ETF is a bad idea for Bitcoin is the pseudo-centralization effect that it will introduce into the ecosystem. What this means is that investors who hold no keys will have no part to play in decision making processes within the ecosystem. Rather, their rights and powers contribute to what would become an enormous concentration of power in the hands of the custodians who hold the keys. In the long run, decision making processes within the ecosystem will lose its original democratization.
“ETFs fundamentally violates the underlying principle of peer-to-peer money, where each user is not operating through a custodian but has direct control of their money because they have direct control of their keys”.
However, according to him the inevitability of an eventual ETF for Bitcoin is not in question. This is because of the enormous market appetite coupled with the very little technical knowledge that exists in the ecosystem. This makes it difficult for institutional investors to hold Bitcoins directly, despite their huge desire to participate in the existing market.
Antonopoulos foresees the creation of two categories of institutional investors in the future. These would comprise of those who have the technical knowhow to actually hold real Bitcoin and gain all the advantages associated with it, and those who depend completely on intermediaries.
Featured image from Wikimedia.
Last modified: January 24, 2020 11:01 PM UTC