The Federal Reserve has cut the U.S. interest rates by 0.25% its September meeting, citing “a still challenging situation” for the American economy and a weak labor market.
Inflation is not yet fully under control, and the job market raised concerns as Fed officials face a growing dilemma: fight lingering inflation or brace for a possible slowdown.
+76
+162
The Federal Reserve cut rates for the first time in 2025, lowering the federal funds range to 4.00%-4.25%. Chair Jerome Powell described the move as a “risk management cut”, reflecting upside risks to inflation and growing downside risks in the labour market in what he called a “challenging situation.”
“Job gains have slowed, and the unemployment rate has edged up but remains low. Inflation has moved up and remains somewhat elevated,” Powell said, adding that risks to the Fed’s dual mandate had shifted closer to balance.
The decision followed a two-day FOMC meeting, where members also confirmed the ongoing reduction of Treasury and agency debt holdings.
Powell stressed that the Fed remains committed to maximum employment and a 2% inflation goal, and that rates could be adjusted further depending on incoming data.
Powell dismissed support for a larger 50 basis point cut, noting only new Fed governor Stephen Miran dissented. Miran, who served in the Trump administration, has been linked to more dovish policy views. Powell insisted the committee remains independent and united.
The Fed’s updated projections showed the median expectation for two more cuts this year, with the funds rate seen at 3.60% in 2025, 3.40% in 2026, and 3.10% in 2027 — a quarter point lower than June’s forecast.
PCE is expected to ease from 3.0% in 2025 to near 2% by 2027, while GDP growth hovers around 1.6–1.9% and unemployment settles near 4.3–4.5%.
Powell highlighted a recent BLS revision that showed U.S. payrolls had been overstated by 911,000 jobs over the past year, intensifying concern about labour market softness.
“Downside risks are now a reality,” Powell admitted, noting that slowing job creation has forced the Fed to reconsider its restrictive stance.
While acknowledging that earlier policy choices might have been different with the revised data, Powell said: “We have to live life looking through the windshield rather than the rear view mirror. We see where we are now and we took appropriate action today.”
According to figures released Thursday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. inflation ticked higher in August, which was in line with expectations.
Headline consumer prices rose 2.9% year-on-year, up from 2.7% in July and matching consensus forecasts cited by FXStreet.
On a monthly basis, CPI climbed 0.4%, double the pace of July’s 0.2% increase and slightly above the expected 0.3%.
Core inflation, which excludes food and energy, held steady. The annual rate remained at 3.1%, while the monthly increase stayed at 0.3%, both in line with forecasts.
For Derren Nathan, Head of Equity Research, Hargreaves Lansdown, “core CPI, the preferred measure of the Federal Reserve Bank, was steady at 3.1% and bang in line with expectations.”
“Taken together with the growing signs of deterioration in the jobs market, investors are choosing to focus on the outlook for U.S. base rates where markets are now pricing in a fall of 0.7% by the end of 2025, with at least a quarter point cut expected next week,” he added.
As bets on a rate cut are almost 100% for next week’s meeting, analysts expect another six reductions before holding monetary policy firm.
Jefferies’ Mohit Kumar said, “We are reaching close to the limit of Fed support pricing. The market is currently pricing in 71 bps of cuts for this year and nearly six cuts until the terminal.”
“We see it difficult to see much more dovish pricing from the Fed, given risks to near-term inflation. In a simplistic world (without Trump influence), we would argue that rates should have been close to neutral if unemployment was peaking around 4.5% and medium-term inflation moving towards 2%. What neutral is can be debatable, but let’s say it’s around 3-3.50%,” he added.
“Of course, there would be pressure from Trump to move rates in a dovish direction. We would still like to believe in the credibility of the Fed, but would add a 25-50bp premium (dovish) for Trump’s influence.”
“Which would take terminal rates close to 2.75%. But this is exactly where the market pricing comes from the Fed. Hence, we do not see much further rally in rates or more pricing of rate cuts from the Fed,” the expert said.
U.S. President Donald Trump said Tuesday he has narrowed his list of candidates for Federal Reserve Chair to four, confirming that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is no longer under consideration.
“I love Scott, but he wants to stay where he is,” Trump said, adding that Bessent declined the role when asked.
The next Fed Chair will replace Jerome Powell when his term ends in May 2026. Trump has been vocal in criticizing Powell, previously calling him a “numbskull” and “moron” over the Fed’s reluctance to cut interest rates.
Trump mentioned that former Fed governor Kevin Warsh and National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett are among the contenders.
“The two Kevins are doing well, and I have two other people who are doing well,” he said.
Meanwhile, Fed Governor Adriana Kugler’s early resignation, effective Friday, gives Trump an immediate vacancy to fill.
He suggested the new appointee might also be a candidate to succeed Powell.
Other names in the mix include Fed Governor Christopher Waller, who recently dissented from the Fed’s decision to hold rates steady.
According to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, ongoing policy shifts in trade, immigration, fiscal matters, and regulation are still taking shape, and their full impact on the economy remains unclear.
“Early indications suggest that tariffs could contribute to higher inflation and slower growth,” Powell said. “Measures of near-term inflation expectations have risen significantly, even though longer-term expectations appear stable for now.”
He added that the Fed’s priority is to prevent any temporary price increases from turning into a sustained inflationary trend.
“Anchoring long-term inflation expectations is critical,” Powell said. “If price pressures build or inflation expectations increase, we will take appropriate action to maintain stability—while also weighing the effects on employment.”
Powell acknowledged that balancing the Fed’s dual mandate—price stability and maximum employment—could become more difficult if economic goals begin to diverge.
“In such a case, we would evaluate how far the economy is from each target and adjust policy accordingly, recognizing that closing those gaps might occur on different timelines.”
Powell noted that the Fed is in a good position to wait for more clarity before making further policy adjustments.
“We will continue to closely monitor economic data and remain committed to achieving both stable prices and maximum employment,” he said. “Elevated unemployment or inflation are both harmful, and we will do everything necessary to support a strong and stable economy.”
Projections and decisions regarding interest rates hold immense sway over the broader economy. They affect various financial markets, including equities, bonds, and commodities.
The Fed’s key tool in this regard is the Federal Funds Rate (FFR). This is the base interest rate that influences banks, bond markets, and the economy. The Fed makes these rate decisions during its FOMC meetings, held eight times yearly. The rate adjustments in 2022 brought about several hikes, with more in store for 2023.
The increase in FFR, in turn, leads to a rise in the prime rate, the fundamental interest rate charged by banks to creditworthy customers. If the FFR goes up, so does the cost of loans and mortgages. This uptick in the cost of servicing loans translates to reduced discretionary income for consumers and businesses. This, in turn, can dampen overall demand and mitigate inflationary pressures.
The implications for stocks are twofold: consumer-dependent sectors like retail and hospitality may face headwinds due to reduced consumer spending. Growth stocks that rely on capital and borrowing could also suffer. This is as investors shift their focus toward more stable, value-oriented investments in response to market volatility and potential downturns.
From a mechanical perspective, rising interest rates put downward pressure on bond values. As rates climb, the bond yield becomes less attractive than the prevailing base rate, leading to a sell-off in bonds.
This effect is particularly pronounced in the case of long-term bonds. In this case, the discrepancy between their yield and the base rate grows over time.
As a result, fixed-income securities also lose value as the opportunity cost of not owning interest-rate-tracking assets increases. Thus, predicting interest rates over the next five years becomes a critical indicator of market trends.
The U.S. has experienced periods of both high and low interest rate volatility in its history. In the postwar era of the 1950s, the FFR remained below 2%, bolstered by postwar stimulus and income growth. Over the next two decades, the rate fluctuated between 3% and 10% during the 1960s and 1970s, soaring to a record high of 19.1% in 1980 amid rampant inflation.
As the U.S. economy stabilized and inflation was controlled, the FFR hovered around 5% throughout the 1990s. However, recessions in 2001 and 2008 forced rates down to historically low levels, where they remained until 2016.
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated another significant rate cut, nearly to zero. In 2022, the Fed increased rates seven times, followed by three hikes in 2023. The central bank brought the rate to its current range between 5.25% and 5.50%, the highest level in 16 years.
The Fed now faces the challenge of navigating uncertain economic conditions. These are marked by rising prices and an economic slowdown compounded by supply chain disruptions. Inflation, as well as the potential for a recession, is a top concern.
Inflation has been a focal point for central bank action. In 2022 and 2023, inflation accelerated due to a mix of demand and supply factors, sometimes interconnected. The Fed’s more hawkish stance appeared to have contributed to moderate price increases.
The rhetoric shifted in July. Official data from the U.S. Labor Department revealed that the inflation rate had reached 3.2% year over year. Costs of housing, car insurance, and food drove this increase.
This marked an uptick from June, which had seen the lowest rate over two years, at 3%. Analysts had anticipated this rise in the headline rate, considering the relatively weak price inflation observed in the previous July.
Despite economic turbulence, the U.S. dollar has remained remarkably resilient. Its status as a safe-haven currency, coupled with increased investor appeal due to the Fed’s hawkish monetary policy, has bolstered its performance. However, as the Fed’s monetary tightening slows and potentially pauses, the strength of the U.S. dollar appears to be waning.

Analysts primarily focus on near-term interest rate forecasts, but long-term projections extend over the next several years. These forecasts offer valuable insights into interest rate expectations.
ING’s interest rate predictions indicate that in 2024, rates will start at 4%, with subsequent cuts to 3.75% in the second quarter, 3.5% in the third, and 3.25% in the final quarter. In 2025, ING predicts a further decline to 3%.
The University of Michigan inflation expectations in the U.S. for the five-year outlook were revised slightly higher to 3% in August 2023. This exceeds the preliminary estimate of 2.9%, matching July’s reading.
Economic growth was between 1.2% and 1.7% in 2024 and 1.5% and 2% in 2025. Analysts saw core PCE inflation falling between 2.4% and 2.7% in 2024 and 2% and 2.2% in 2025.
Meanwhile, experts surveyed by Trading Economics note a decline in U.S. consumer inflation expectations for the coming year.
Expectations for year-ahead price growth have shifted, with gas decreasing by 0.2% to 4.5% and food by 0.1% to 5.2%, the lowest since September 2020. Medical care will decrease by 0.9% to 8.4%, the lowest since November 2020, and college education by 0.3% to 8%. Rent will fall by 0.4% to 9%, the lowest since January 2021.
Also, median home price growth expectations decreased to 2.8% in July from 2.9% in June. Meanwhile, consumers also see lower inflation in three years at 2.9% from a previously expected 3% and in five years at 2.9% from 3%.
Manufacturing activity displayed mixed results, though multiple districts showed a brighter outlook for the sector.
The labor market showed signs of easing nationwide. Most districts reported slight to moderate increases in overall employment. This, albeit with a reduced sense of urgency among firms in their hiring efforts. However, recruiting and hiring skilled workers remained challenging.
Wage growth remained moderate, with candidates showing less resistance to wage offers. Many firms adjusted their compensation packages to offset higher labor costs. They incorporated measures like remote work options instead of wage increases, reduced sign-on bonuses, or other enhancements.
Price trends indicated modest overall increases, with input costs stabilizing or slowing for manufacturers while continuing to rise for service sector businesses.
Factors such as fuel costs, wages, and insurance contributed to price growth. Sales prices increased slower than input prices as businesses grappled with passing on cost pressures. This was due to heightened price sensitivity among consumers, which impacted profit margins.
In the coming quarters, firms generally anticipate price increases, but at a slower pace than previous periods. Several districts reported fewer firms expecting significant price hikes in the foreseeable future.
Bitcoin and other digital assets have demonstrated resilience in a rising interest rate environment. For instance, Bitcoin experienced remarkable growth of 2,000% in 2015 and 2016, during a period marked by rising interest rates.
Nevertheless, some experts argue that persistently high inflation, gas prices, and energy costs resulting from elevated interest rates may dampen risk appetite, potentially posing headwinds for cryptocurrencies.
Central banks wield significant influence, directly affecting money circulation and financial market stability. They have the power to modify interest rates, which, in turn, affects the borrowing rates for financial and banking institutions. Recently, central banks in major developed economies, such as the Fed, ECB, and BoE, have increased interest rates in response to widespread inflation.
Notably, cryptocurrencies are increasingly intertwined with these macroeconomic and monetary shifts. In particular, the decisions to raise interest rates, especially by the Fed, directly affect the cryptocurrency markets.
In simpler terms, the Fed’s more assertive stance has cast a shadow over cryptocurrencies, impacting market sentiment as tighter monetary policies loom.