Donald Trump has announced he looks forward to signing a new measure that criminalizes the publication of nonconsensual sexual deepfakes, following its overwhelming approval in Congress on Monday.
The legislation, known as the Take It Down Act, passed with a bipartisan vote of 409–2 and has drawn some criticism from digital rights advocates, who argue that it grants excessive power to online service providers.
On Monday, April 29, the Take It Down Act cleared its final hurdle in Congress and is now on its way to the President’s desk for his signature, The Hill reported .
Once signed by Trump, the bill will make it a federal crime to publish—or even threaten to publish—AI-generated deepfakes that depict real, identifiable people engaged in sexually explicit acts without their consent.
The law mandates that social media platforms and other online service providers remove flagged images and videos within 48 hours of receiving a takedown request.
“The Senate just passed the Take It Down Act. Once it passes the House, I look forward to signing that bill into law,” Trump said in March.
“And I’m going to use that bill for myself too, if you don’t mind—because nobody gets treated worse than I do online. Nobody,” he added.
The bill has received strong bipartisan support across Congress.
Republican Senator Ted Cruz, who introduced the legislation , emphasized the need for proactive measures:
“It shouldn’t take a sitting senator or member of Congress picking up the phone to get a harmful photo or video taken down.”
Only two Republicans voted against the bill in the House.
First Lady Melania Trump also endorsed the legislation, appearing at a public discussion in March to promote its passage.
“It’s heartbreaking to witness young teens, especially girls, grappling with the overwhelming challenges posed by malicious online content like deepfakes,” she said. “This toxic environment can be severely damaging.”
Despite its broad support, the legislation has been criticized by advocates of digital privacy and civil liberties.
Jason Kelley, Activism Director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), warned that the law poses “a huge threat to security and privacy online.”
Critics argue that the 48-hour takedown window may not provide sufficient time to verify whether the content is illegal, prompting platforms to remove questionable material by default to avoid legal risk.
“Lawmakers should focus on strengthening and enforcing existing protections for victims, rather than creating new takedown systems that are vulnerable to abuse,” Kelley said.
Kelley also warned that online service providers will likely utilize automated filters, which are “infamously blunt tools.”