Key Takeaways
- Jeremy Allaire argues OUSD’s consortium model is structurally difficult to scale.
- Circle points to its own Centre Consortium as evidence that shared governance failed.
- OUSD’s biggest challenge may be aligning 140 partners into a functioning payment network.
Jeremy Allaire published a lengthy X post on July 1 that was careful, pointed, and devastating in sequence. He began by explaining stablecoins as platform and network-effect businesses that tend toward winner-take-most outcomes, and spent the rest of the post explaining why OUSD’s model undermines the very infrastructure required to compete at that level.
His critique landed on three specific targets:
- First, free and unlimited minting and redemption at scale: Allaire argued this is financially unsustainable and would deprive the network of the capital needed to maintain banking relationships, regulatory licensing, and technical infrastructure across multiple jurisdictions.
- Second, distributing nearly all reserve income to consortium partners: Allaire said this model risks “starving the infrastructure,” the same word he used when describing why Circle ultimately dissolved the Centre Consortium it co-founded with Coinbase in 2023 and consolidated USDC issuance under a single entity.
- Third, the governance structure itself: “Large groups of large companies coordinate poorly, have misaligned incentives, slow things down and rarely create the space for real durable innovation,” he wrote. The track record of such products reaching scale is, in his words, “absolutely dismal.”
Circle already tried the consortium model and abandoned it
The detail that gives Allaire’s critique its greatest credibility is that Circle is not speculating about consortium failure. It has experienced it firsthand. USDC launched in 2018 under the Centre Consortium, a joint governance structure between Circle and Coinbase. By August 2023, Circle dissolved the Centre and assumed sole governance of USDC, ending the shared model after five years.
Circle has since turned that experience into a competitive argument. The company now argues that stablecoins governed by a single issuer can move faster, align incentives more effectively, and scale more efficiently than consortium-led models. The Centre experience is the strongest evidence supporting Allaire’s thesis.
History Suggests Stablecoin Consortiums Struggle to Scale
The historical record backs Allaire’s case at every data point. Meta’s Diem, formerly known as Libra, assembled a founding consortium in 2019 that included Visa, Mastercard, Uber, and dozens of other companies. Regulatory pressure and internal coordination failures collapsed the project before it launched commercially.
Paxos’s Global Dollar Network (USDG) is the closest operational precedent to OUSD. Despite backing from major financial institutions and a revenue-sharing consortium model, USDG has grown to only about $3 billion in supply, far below USDC’s roughly $77 billion. That gap illustrates how assembling large partners does not automatically create liquidity or network effects.
This ceiling, is what ARK Invest Director of Research Lorenzo Valente called the “cold-start problem” that consolidated liquidity creates for every new entrant regardless of the size of its backer list.
OUSD’s Biggest Challenge May Be Its Own Partners
OUSD’s 140-name backer roster contains two tension points that no amount of consortium press releases can paper over.
BlackRock manages the Circle Reserve Fund that backs USDC’s reserves, making it simultaneously the custodian of Circle’s primary asset and a financial backer of its most direct competitor. That is not a conflict that resolves cleanly on either side.
The Coinbase dynamic is sharper still. Coinbase’s distribution agreement with Circle, filed as an exhibit to Coinbase’s 10-K, runs on an initial three-year term from its August 18, 2023 effective date with automatic renewals contingent on Coinbase meeting product and reseller thresholds. That agreement comes up for renewal in approximately six weeks, generating close to 20% of Coinbase’s total revenue.
Coinbase is simultaneously a founding OUSD backer. Allaire said publicly that “our stablecoin partnership with Coinbase remains as strong as ever,” a statement that reads less like reassurance and more like a negotiating position delivered in public before a contract renewal deadline.
Bernstein analysts flagged the Coinbase participation in OUSD as something that “has raised eyebrows,” but maintained their Outperform rating on CRCL and a $190 price target, calling OUSD the most formidable challenge the Circle-Tether duopoly has faced while also noting that coordinating 140-plus partners represents a considerable operational undertaking. William Blair kept its own Outperform and called the selloff an overreaction, echoing Allaire’s core argument that logos are not liquidity.
CRCL closed at $62.63 on June 30, down 17.55%, a combined selloff driven by OUSD’s announcement and Circle’s removal from five FTSE Russell Growth indexes during the 2026 annual reconstitution. The stock recovered 2.44% pre-market on July 2.
Whether OUSD eventually challenges USDC’s 80% transaction share depends on whether 140 logos can become 140 active distribution partners on a timetable that actually pressures Circle’s business before the August renewal is signed, sealed, and extended.
internal-linking title=”Top Trending Crypto Articles” url1=”https://www.ccn.com/crypto-exchanges/” text1=”Check Out Our Recommended Exchanges Here” label1=”Best Exchanges” url2=”https://www.ccn.com/how-to-buy-crypto-with-credit-card/” text2=”How To Buy Crypto with a Credit Card Now” label2=”Buy Crypto Fast” url3=”https://www.ccn.com/crypto-gambling/” text3=”See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites” label3=”Safe Crypto Gambling”]
The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, financial advice. We do not make any warranties regarding the completeness, reliability, or accuracy of this information. All investments involve risk, and past performance does not guarantee future results. We recommend consulting a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
Dr. Guneet Kaur is a senior editor at CCN.com and a Science Fellow at Exponential Science. She is a fintech and blockchain expert with extensive experience in digital finance education, blockchain ecosystems, and cryptocurrency markets. She has worked with global media such as Cointelegraph, as well as education and blockchain platforms, to design and lead strategic content and learning initiatives. As an educator and assessor for top-tier executive programs, she bridges real-world fintech trends with academic insight.
Dr. Kaur is also a published researcher and peer reviewer across fintech and data science journals, including Financial Innovation Journal and International Journal of Big Data Intelligence and Applications. Her work spans data-driven analysis, Web3 innovation, and technical content development. With a strong foundation in both industry and academia, she translates complex financial technologies into practical applications, empowering learners, professionals, and institutions across the rapidly evolving digital finance landscape.
