Key Takeaways
The shooting of political activist Charlie Kirk on Sept. 10, 2025, triggered a wave of meme cryptocurrency tokens using his name. Coins like RIPCharlieKirk, JusticeForCharlie, and CHARLIE skyrocketed by tens of thousands of percent before crashing.
This boom-and-bust cycle illustrates the dangers of speculative crypto investing and highlights recurring issues of hype, ethics, and regulation.
Charlie Kirk memecoins are digital tokens created by anonymous developers within hours of the news of his shooting. They had no official connection to Kirk or his organization. Built on fast-deployment platforms like Solana’s pump.fun, these tokens capitalized on viral headlines and investor FOMO.
+76
Unlike established cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, these coins offered no real-world utility, governance, or product, only speculative value driven by hype.
The creators of hype-linked memecoins remain largely unknown because:
The surge of these tokens followed a predictable pattern common in memecoin markets:
This cycle mirrors countless pump-and-dump schemes in crypto, where prices soar on hype and collapse once momentum fades.
According to X user @nichxbt, the fees earned from launching the $CHARLIE memecoin, also referred to as Justice For Charlie Kirk, on @pumpdotfun amounted to around $156,090 (approximately 700.851 SOL) in creator rewards. This highlights how quickly tragedy-linked tokens can generate substantial profits for their creators, even in a short span of time, by capitalizing on hype and speculation.
In early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic gave rise to numerous cryptocurrency scams that exploited global tragedy. Researchers identified nearly two hundred confirmed COVID-19 crypto scams, with close to half involving newly launched tokens.
Many of these projects claimed to donate proceeds to victims or tied their mechanics to case and death numbers, but most were speculative or fraudulent.
One notable example was CoronaCoin, a token that reduced its supply in proportion to rising infection numbers, marketed under the idea that scarcity would increase value. While developers pledged a portion for charity, critics widely condemned the concept as unethical.
A similar pattern repeated in September 2022 following the death of Queen Elizabeth II. Within hours, more than forty memecoins using her name were created, with titles such as Queen Elizabeth Inu and God Save The Queen.
$IRYNA is another Solana-based “tribute” memecoin launched on Pump.fun following the fatal stabbing of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska. The token’s narrative quickly morphed as the community accused its original developer of not fulfilling promises; in response, holders attempted a “community takeover,” redirecting trading fees toward a GoFundMe set up for Iryna’s family.

At its peak in early September 2025, IRYNA reached an all-time high market cap of about $4.9 million, before falling to around $3.8 million during subsequent volatility. The token has seen high trading volume, though it remains highly speculative and risky.
Some of the above-discussed memecoins saw enormous but short-lived price surges before collapsing, leaving late investors with steep losses.
Tokens like $CHARLIE and JusticeForCharlie skyrocketed by more than 50,000%, briefly reaching multi-million-dollar market caps before crashing sharply.

According to on-chain data and crypto analysts, one creator reportedly earned around $300,000 in fees within an hour, while combined developer profits across several tokens may have approached $2 million.
The Charlie Kirk memecoin phenomenon teaches valuable lessons about speculative crypto markets:
The Charlie Kirk memecoin surge is more than a curiosity, it’s a reminder of how fragile, unregulated, and ethically complex parts of the crypto market can be.
For some, these coins brought quick profits. For many more, they ended in financial loss. For educators and regulators, the case highlights the urgent need for investor awareness, ethical reflection, and smarter safeguards in the fast-moving world of crypto.
No. The tokens were launched by anonymous developers with no official ties to Kirk. Mostly due to FOMO and the dream of fast profits. Some also claim symbolic reasons, but financial speculation is the main driver. They exist in a regulatory grey zone. While creating tokens isn’t illegal, deceptive or exploitative tokens may fall under fraud or securities law. Only invest what you can afford to lose, avoid tokens tied to breaking news or tragedy, and focus on projects with transparent teams and real utility.