The recent statement from the U.S. President declaring that “The United States is going to dominate crypto … and it’s not going to be easy, but we’re way ahead,” signals great promise for companies and financial institutions.
It is now clear that the new administration in the U.S. wants to maintain the dominance of the U.S. dollar, especially as they push clear stablecoin regulation.
But the expression also encourages other nations to continue to advance their own digital currencies.
Every month, more countries announce plans to start developing their own CBDCs. In February, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) told Namibia that it had no urgent need for a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).
Yet, just a month later, the Bank of Namibia announced its intent to move forward with the development of its own digital Namibian dollar.
The Bank of Namibia’s move is part of a growing global trend in which countries are proactively developing their own digital currencies, despite the U.S.’s reluctance to launch a digital dollar.
The world’s largest economy has chosen to rely on private stablecoins like USDC and USDT rather than developing a government-backed digital dollar.
This decision is convenient for a country that already holds the world’s dominant reserve currency.
In recent years, dozens of central banks have been exploring or actively piloting CBDCs. China’s digital yuan (e-CNY) has seen significant progress, with expanded trials that integrate cross-border transactions and trade settlements.
For example, Brazil’s Drex is entering its next phase , targeting wholesale transactions and programmable finance.
Meanwhile, Europe is laying the groundwork for a Digital Euro, supported by the comprehensive MiCA regulatory framework. Not only the big players, but even smaller entities like the Bahamas, with its Sand Dollar, show CBDCs aren’t just for juggernauts.
Contrast this with the U.S., where the dollar’s global status as the world’s dominant currency means it has no need for its own digital dollar.
The dollar is king, and stablecoins, in a market valued at approximately $200 billion , extend its reach without government meddling.
The U.S. decision hasn’t stopped others from pushing ahead with their own plans. And now, other nations aren’t pausing for permission – they’re building fast.
Once upon a time the world might have been looking toward the U.S. for regulatory direction, but the groundwork is now being laid by other global leaders. The UAE and Europe, for instance, have already implemented forward-thinking digital currency regulations.
The EU’s MiCA framework has set a powerful precedent by establishing a harmonized regulatory environment across 27 member states .
A crypto asset approved in one EU country can be offered across the entire bloc without additional hurdles, dismantling the regulatory fragmentation that once bogged down innovation.
MiCA’s clear standards have fuelled a surge in euro-backed stablecoins like EURC, reaching an all-time high of 67% recently, according to industry reports. Such success has made the EU a hub for digital finance, influencing regulators from Singapore to Canada to study its model.
Meanwhile, China’s e-CNY is rewriting the rules of scale and ambition. It began as pilots in cities like Shenzhen and Suzhou and now has quickly exploded into a nationwide rollout.
The digital yuan’s transaction volume has reached $982 billion , with full deployment targeted for 2026, per the People’s Bank of China.
Beyond domestic use, China is testing the e-CNY for use in cross-border payments, linking Hong Kong to Thailand and beyond. This is a strategic play to reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar and SWIFT, potentially reshaping Asia’s trade networks particularly with the West.
Now that the U.S. has formally foregone the digital dollar, the move is almost a green light signal for the rest of the world to follow the EU’s and China’s lead.
Will this shift change the way the world looks at the U.S. for digital asset leadership? Probably not – the U.S. remains an economic powerhouse, and Trump’s stance on crypto remains influential.
CBDCs are simply a digitalization of existing currencies rather than new competitors to fiat. But their rise could significantly compete with the dominance of currently available USD-backed stablecoins like USDT and USDC.
As global CBDCs gain traction, demand for USD-backed stablecoins may decline, shifting liquidity toward government-backed digital currencies and potentially altering the balance of digital finance.
While the U.S. debates, other nations can now launch CBDC products, riding Europe’s regulatory rails and China and Brazil’s live examples. And the U.S. won’t dictate those terms – it will have to adapt to them.
America’s reliance on stablecoins may sustain the dollar’s dominance in the short term, but as CBDCs gain traction, the country risks ceding influence over the future of digital finance.
The question is no longer whether digital currencies will become a global standard, but rather who will define and control their development.
If the U.S. wants to remain a key player in this digital financial evolution, you can bet they’re watching what the rest of the world does very closely.