In a Telegram post on Monday, April 21, Telegram founder Pavel Durov reaffirmed his commitment to encryption, following renewed pressure from the French government to introduce backdoor access into major messaging platforms.
A long-time advocate for digital privacy, Durov stated that Telegram would rather exit a market than “undermine encryption with backdoors.”
Last month, the French Senate passed a provision that would have required leading messaging apps to implement backdoors, granting law enforcement access to encrypted communications.
Although the National Assembly ultimately rejected the measure, the debate resurfaced recently when the Paris Police Prefect called for its reconsideration.
In his Telegram post, Durov praised the National Assembly’s decision, saying France narrowly avoided becoming “the first country in the world to strip its citizens of their right to privacy.”
He pointed out that even countries “many Europeans view as lacking in freedoms” have not banned encryption.
Durov argued that it is “technically impossible” to create a backdoor that only law enforcement can access.
“Once introduced, a backdoor can be exploited by others—from foreign agents to hackers,” he wrote. “As a result, the private messages of all law-abiding citizens can be compromised.”
He also noted that such legislation would not effectively curb criminal activity since bad actors could simply switch to smaller, less visible platforms with strong encryption.
“This is why, as I’ve said before, Telegram would rather exit a market than undermine encryption with backdoors and violate basic human rights,” he stated.
Taking aim at competitors, Durov added: “Unlike some of our competitors, we don’t trade privacy for market share.”
In his post, Durov emphasized how he believed lawmakers needed continued education on the importance of encryption.
“Last month, freedom prevailed,” Durov wrote. “But it was a reminder: we must keep explaining to lawmakers that encryption isn’t built to protect criminals — it protects the privacy and safety of ordinary people.”
The debate over encryption is not limited to France. Governments around the world continue to grapple with the tension between national security and individual privacy.
Durov also addressed the European Commission’s recent ProtectEU initiative, which proposes a roadmap for lawful access to encrypted data by 2026.
“The battle is far from over,” he wrote. “No country is immune to the slow erosion of freedoms. Every day, those freedoms come under attack — and every day, we must defend them.”