Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, has officially launched his controversial biometric and crypto project, formerly known as Worldcoin and now rebranded as World, in six major U.S. cities.
The launch follows bans in several countries, including Kenya, Spain, and Hong Kong, due to regulatory and privacy concerns.
On April 30, Altman announced that World would establish “key innovation hubs” in five U.S. states.
These hubs will be located in Atlanta, Austin, Los Angeles, Miami, Nashville, and San Francisco.
At these locations, citizens can scan their irises using World’s distinctive devices, known as Orbs, to obtain a unique “proof of human” ID.
World describes the process as simple: users download the World App, “verify their humanity” via the Orb’s biometric technology, and unlock platform features. These features include:
World’s technology is developed by Tools for Humanity, which has offices in San Francisco and Erlangen, Germany.
Despite its U.S. expansion, World continues to face global scrutiny over its use of sensitive biometric data.
On May 4, Indonesia’s Ministry of Communications and Digital Affairs (Komdigi) suspended World’s ID verification and Worldcoin (WLD) token operations.
Authorities cited “suspicious activity” and stated that the local entity, PT. Terang Bulan Abadi, was not registered as an Electronic System Operator and therefore lacked the necessary legal authorization to operate.
Tools for Humanity previously told CCN that it had voluntarily paused its services in Indonesia and is seeking clarification regarding regulatory compliance.
In Kenya, authorities blocked World signups and ordered the deletion of all collected biometric data within seven days.
A High Court ruling found that the company failed to meet legal standards for biometric data collection.
Last year, Hong Kong banned World after it was found to be violating the region’s data privacy laws.
Tools for Humanity claimed that authorities overlooked key privacy protections built into their verification process.
Privacy experts have raised concerns over World’s biometric data collection that they believe could present long-term privacy risks.
In the U.S., the legal framework around biometric data varies by state.
Some states where World plans to operate, such as Georgia, Tennessee, and Florida, lack comprehensive biometric privacy laws altogether.
Texas has limited biometric protections but lacks a dedicated enforcement agency. This means any legal action would fall to the state attorney general, making enforcement less predictable.