Key Takeaways
The federal government is suing Utah to block the state’s attempt to stop Kalshi from offering prediction markets to its residents.
Utah argues that Kalshi’s contracts, which let users trade on the outcomes of sports, elections, and other events, constitute illegal gambling.
Meanwhile, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) says those products fall under federal financial regulation and that Utah has no authority to ban them.
The lawsuit, filed on Oct. 26 and announced the following day, makes Utah the tenth state to face legal action from the regulator over prediction markets.
The federal case follows Utah Attorney General Derek Brown’s Oct. 20 lawsuit against Kalshi businesses and two Susquehanna trading firms that participate in its markets.
Utah wants to prevent the companies from offering several categories of event contracts to residents and recover money it alleges they earned through illegal gambling.
The United States and CFTC have now filed a separate lawsuit against Utah and Brown in federal court, asking a judge to block that enforcement effort.
Their argument centers on who has authority over the contracts.
The federal government says they qualify as swaps, a type of financial derivative regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act.
It argues that Congress gave the CFTC exclusive authority over these transactions, preventing Utah from applying its gambling laws to them.
“Congress entrusted the CFTC to be the federal regulator with sole responsibility to oversee these markets,” CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said.
Selig said event contracts can help users manage financial risks and invest, while also providing information about likely future outcomes.
Utah has disputed that, alleging the companies are facilitating gambling regardless of how their products are described.\
The new federal action arrives after a setback for Kalshi in its own Utah litigation.
On Aug. 4, US District Judge Robert Shelby granted Utah summary judgment, finding that federal commodities law did not override the state’s gambling laws.
The Tenth Circuit denied Kalshi’s request for an injunction pending appeal on Sept. 8, according to SBC Americas.
Utah’s action follows months of challenges to the industry’s argument that federal derivatives oversight prevents states from applying gambling laws.
As CCN reported in August, a Washington state judge ordered Kalshi to restrict access to markets covering sports, elections, politics, and other categories. That dispute showed how enforcement could extend beyond sports betting.
Regulatory pressure has also forced businesses to change their product offerings.
Founder Jeremy Levine said those states had effectively required the company to choose between retaining its fantasy licenses and continuing its federally regulated prediction-market products.
Consumer protections are another point of contention.
Prediction-market age limits highlight that Kalshi and Polymarket US accept eligible customers from 18, while New York’s licensed mobile sportsbooks require users to be 21.
New York has challenged both operators over alleged unlicensed gambling.