Meet the Top 101 in Crypto

Korean Lawmakers Review Three Rival Stablecoin Bills on the Road to Regulation

Published 24 November 2025
James Morales
Authors
Edited by Insha Zia
Key Takeaways
  • South Korean lawmakers met to review three competing stablecoin bills on Monday.
  • Both main parties have proposed stablecoin legislation in the National Assembly.
  • The two sides disagree on whether to allow interest payments.

South Korean lawmakers took a major step toward stablecoin regulation on Monday, Nov. 24, when the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee convened to review three competing bills.

According to local media reports, the proposed legislation includes two bills put forward by the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK), and one from the opposition People Power Party (PPP).

Try Our Recommended Crypto Exchanges
Sponsored
Disclosure
Promotions
Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.
Coins
Bitcoin Ethereum Tether USD Coin Solana +76
Opened in 2011
Promotions
Get up to 10,055 USDT when you register, verify, and make the first deposit and the first trades.
Coins
Ethereum Tether USD Coin Solana Ripple +162
Promotions
Experience a 1-minute swap on a non-custodial platform.
Coins
Bitcoin Ethereum Tether Build'N'Build USD Coin +217
Show More

Influential Committee Picks up Stablecoin Regulation

Within South Korea’s National Assembly, the Political Affairs Committee is a powerful gatekeeper for financial regulation.

For the unicameral legislature, it is the equivalent of the House Financial Services Committee or the Senate Banking Committee in the United States Congress.

According to sources cited by Bloomingbit, the committee opened a plenary meeting on Monday morning with the review of three bills on the agenda.

From the DPK, Kim Hyun-jung’s “Value-Stabilized Digital Asset Issuance Business Bill” and Ahn Do-geol’s “Value-Stabilized Digital Asset Issuance and Distribution Bill” were under discussion.

Meanwhile, Kim Eun-hye’s “Bill on Payment Innovation Using Fixed-Value Digital Assets” represented the PPP’s alternative vision for stablecoin regulation.

Competing Visions

While they share some basic commitments, the DPK and the PPP diverge on other aspects of stablecoin policy.

All three bills would set similar reserve requirements and require stablecoin issuers to be regulated and licensed by the Financial Services Commission (FSC).

Both parties have also aligned around a minimum capital requirement for issuers of 5 billion won.

However, the two sides disagree on whether to allow interest payments.

In the mold of the U.S. GENIUS Act, the DPK prefers a ban on interest-bearing stablecoins. But no such provision exists in Kim Eun-hye’s proposal.

Other differences relate to consumer protections, minimum redemption times, and the treatment of non-KRW stablecoins.

James Morales

James Morales is CCN’s blockchain and crypto policy reporter. He has been working in the news media since 2020, writing about topics such as payments, banking and financial technology. These days, he likes to explore the latest blockchain innovations and the evolving landscape of global crypto regulation.

With an educational background in social anthropology and media studies, James uses his platform as a journalist to explore how new technologies work, why they matter and how they might shape our future.

Related

Survey Icon
Help us improve
1 of 4
Is this your first time here?
What brought you here today?
What are you most interested in?
Would you be interested in:
Thank you icon
Thank you for your feedback!
DMCA.com Protection Status