Key Takeaways
Bitcoin cycles are recurring market patterns marked by shifts between bullish and bearish phases. Bull markets are driven by strong demand and optimistic sentiment, leading to sharp price increases, while bear markets are defined by price declines and more cautious, risk-averse investor behavior.
These fluctuations aren’t random and follow a rhythm deeply rooted in Bitcoin’s code. At the heart of this cycle is the Bitcoin halving, a scheduled event that reduces the rate at which new Bitcoin is created roughly every four years. This supply shock often sets the stage for the next major price cycle.
With the most recent halving taking place on April 20, 2024, the market is now entering a familiar phase, one that has historically paved the way for explosive price discovery.
This article explores whether Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle will continue to play out in 2025, or whether shifting market dynamics, institutional adoption, and sovereign interest could alter the cycle that’s been defined over a decade of price action.
Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle forms the backbone of its market behavior. Each cycle tends to follow four distinct phases:
The 2017 cycle peaked at approximately $20,000, followed by an 80% crash. The 2021 cycle hit $69,000 before retracing to $15,500. Both were kick-started by previous halvings and followed this 4-phase structure.
The fourth Bitcoin halving took place on April 20, 2024, cutting block rewards from 6.25 BTC to 3.125. The Bitcoin market is now approaching one year post-halving, which has historically marked the start of the steepest part of the bull run.
Despite recent 20%+ drawdowns, many believe the market is simply shaking out weak hands, not ending the cycle. Bitcoin is still widely considered on track to reach $200,000 by Q4 2025, as outlined in the chart above, and also a level outlined by the power law model, gaining the most traction among market observers. Current conditions suggest Bitcoin is in the mid-bull or “sweet spot” phase, just before potential euphoria.
With the entrance of ETFs, sovereign interest, and corporate adoption, it is a fair assessment to wonder if the 4-year cycle is over.
There’s no clear answer yet, but evidence points to institutions possibly extending cycles, not ending them. Institutions buy slowly and in bulk. Institutional interest may suppress volatility at tops and bottoms, smoothing out extremes but not removing the pattern altogether.
The Bitcoin halving still affects miners, supply dynamics, and public narrative. These factors are unchanged and they’re core to the cycle.
America’s potential Bitcoin accumulation via Trump’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is now a real possibility.
As Congressman Nick Begich explained, March 11, 2025, “The Bitcoin Act establishes a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and ensures America will remain the dominant player in the digital financial era by strengthening our national economic security.” Under the proposed plan, the United States would acquire 1 million Bitcoin over the next five years, representing nearly 5% of the 21M supply.
To do this without causing a price shock, the U.S. could utilize:
If enacted, this accumulation could result in:
Would this end the 4-year cycle?
Unlikely. Institutional involvement might accelerate price action or cause an early top, but the market is still driven by human emotions and humans tend to move in cycles.
Across every cycle, investors often intend to buy during periods of low valuation and exit during market peaks. Yet, repeatedly, the same emotional forces influence investors, such as fear during downturns and greed during price rallies.
During euphoric phases, optimism tends to cloud judgment, creating the illusion of limitless upside. Conversely, in downturns, pessimism dominates, and many believe the decline is irreversible. As long as human emotion plays a central role in trading behavior, Bitcoin’s cyclical patterns are likely to persist.
Yes, it’s possible that the current cycle period could reach its peak earlier, perhaps in early to mid-2025, without breaking the underlying 4-year market cycle. This would not necessarily invalidate the 4-year cycle, but it could reflect a compressed version of it.
Several factors could accelerate the above-mentioned timeline:
In this scenario, the 4-year cycle phases may unfold more quickly:
The 4-year cycle doesn’t just shape market expectations but strengthens Bitcoin’s reliability as a long-term savings vehicle.
Bitcoin’s cyclical behavior gives it the characteristics of a programmable savings instrument. Investors who commit capital across a full cycle, particularly over a 4+ year horizon, have historically outperformed traditional assets. a
As shown in the chart above, Bitcoin outperformed all other major asset classes in 8 of the 11 years between 2013 and 2023, frequently delivering returns well above equities, bonds, commodities, and emerging markets. Despite its year-to-year volatility, long-term holders have consistently captured Bitcoin’s asymmetric upside, strengthening its position as a reliable long-term store of value.
While some argue that institutional involvement, sovereign accumulation, and macro shifts could alter the 4-year cycle, the more profound truth is that the cycle reflects predictable behavior and belief and is a time-tested economic pattern.
The next peak may arrive earlier than expected and institutions may influence volatility. However, as long as Bitcoin’s issuance schedule remains fixed and human psychology remains intact, the core dynamics of the cycle are likely to continue. Which gives insiders of this 4-year cycle an edge.
From everyday savers to sovereign states, Bitcoin rewards those who spend time in the market instead of waiting for the market. The 4-year cycle isn’t a promise—it’s a signal, a historical pattern. Bitcoin’s built-in predictability may be one of its greatest strengths in an era of economic instability and global uncertainty.
Historically, yes. Each halving (2012, 2016, 2020, 2024) has preceded a strong bull market phase, though past performance doesn’t guarantee future outcomes. Not likely. Institutions may stretch or compress cycle timing, but market psychology and fixed supply still reinforce the core pattern. If historical patterns hold, we may be in the mid-bull phase. While risk increases near the top, many long-term investors focus on multi-year horizons, not exact timing.Has every Bitcoin halving been followed by a bull run?
Could institutional demand end the 4-year cycle?
Is it too late to invest in Bitcoin during the current cycle?