Key Takeaways
On July 29, 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) took a landmark step by approving in-kind creations and redemptions for crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs), including those holding Bitcoin and Ethereum.
This is more than a technical change in how ETFs operate; it’s a pivotal moment in the evolution of regulated crypto markets.
Let’s learn more about it.
Before this decision, all U.S.-listed crypto ETFs were subject to cash-only redemption rules. When investors redeemed their ETF shares, authorized participants (APs) were required to liquidate the underlying crypto assets for cash before delivering redemption proceeds.
This approach was rooted in concerns over custody, market manipulation, and operational risks in crypto markets. The SEC feared that directly handling crypto during redemptions could increase systemic risk and complicate market oversight. As a result:
For years, issuers like BlackRock (IBIT), Grayscale, and ARK 21Shares lobbied for parity with other commodity-based ETFs, arguing that crypto infrastructure has matured. The SEC’s latest ruling signals acknowledgment of those advancements.
In traditional ETF markets, in-kind redemptions allow authorized participants (the institutions responsible for creating and redeeming ETF shares) to exchange ETF shares for the underlying assets directly, instead of settling in cash.
This mechanism is standard for most ETFs that hold physical commodities like gold or baskets of equities, ensuring efficient market operations.
In-kind redemptions reduce tax inefficiencies, lower transaction costs, and tighten bid-ask spreads — all critical for institutional investors. By allowing crypto to be exchanged directly rather than sold for cash, this mechanism makes ETFs more scalable, competitive, and aligned with traditional financial products like gold or equity ETFs.
| Features | Before (Cash-Only Redemptions) | After (In-Kind Redemptions) |
| Redemption mechanism | Sell crypto → pay out cash | Deliver crypto directly |
| Transaction costs | High (market slippage, fees) | Lower (direct transfers) |
| NAV tracking | Looser (premium/discount issues) | Tighter (faster arbitrage) |
| Tax treatment | Immediate taxable event | Deferred until crypto sale |
| Institutional appeal | Moderate (structural frictions) | High (aligned with commodity ETF norms) |
Think of it like a fruit basket store (ETP) and wholesale suppliers (Authorized Participants or APs):
If the supplier only used cash:
By swapping fruit for fruit baskets directly, there are fewer steps, lower costs, and faster transactions.
For investors, this means more efficient trading and potentially lower fees.
A regulatory shift is set to reshape crypto ETFs in the U.S. by removing long‑standing operational frictions that kept major institutions on the sidelines. The change is expected to boost trading efficiency, attract significant new capital, and bring U.S. markets closer to global peers. Industry leaders are already positioned to benefit as analysts project billions in fresh inflows over the coming year.
The SEC’s approval of in-kind creations and redemptions for crypto ETFs is more than a technical rule change, it represents regulatory maturity and market evolution. By removing structural inefficiencies, ETFs holding Bitcoin and Ethereum can now compete on equal footing with traditional commodity ETFs.
For investors, this means tighter spreads, better tax efficiency, and a stronger case for institutional adoption. For the crypto industry, it’s a vote of confidence from regulators that crypto markets have evolved to the point of handling sophisticated financial structures responsibly.
Bottom line: If 2024 was the year crypto ETFs entered the mainstream, then 2025 might be remembered as the year they became truly institutional.
In-kind redemption means ETF shares are redeemed for the underlying asset (e.g., Bitcoin or Ethereum) instead of cash. Cash redemptions require selling the underlying asset for cash, which can create inefficiencies and taxable events. In-kind processes are more efficient and tax-friendly. No. Only authorized participants (APs), typically large financial institutions, can execute in-kind transactions. Retail investors still buy and sell ETF shares on exchanges in cash. Indirectly, yes. With reduced slippage and transaction costs, ETF issuers may pass savings onto investors over time, or at least maintain competitive fee levels while improving liquidity. Potentially. With proven operational models and regulatory comfort, ETF issuers could push for additional crypto products (e.g., Solana or Polygon). However, each asset must meet regulatory scrutiny on liquidity, custody, and market integrity.