Iran’s $7.8 billion crypto economy faces new risks as US–Israel strikes threaten the power grid sustaining Tehran’s digital lifeline. | Credit: CCN.com
Share
Key Takeaways
U.S.–Iran tensions are rising, increasing fears of a potential military escalation in early 2026.
President Trump’s statements and tariff threats have heightened global market uncertainty.
Bitcoin has recently exhibited more high-risk behavior than a safe haven during geopolitical shocks.
An initial military strike would likely trigger a sharp BTC sell-off due to liquidity stress.
Gold and silver currently outperform Bitcoin, weakening the digital gold narrative.
Institutional Bitcoin accumulation remains strong but could pause during extreme geopolitical risk.
It’s only the second week of the New Year 2026, and the prospect of a U.S. military escalation with Iran under President Trump has become increasingly possible.
While there is no confirmation yet, Trump has hinted that it could be possible with his latest statements.
This event (if it happens) could become a central “Black Swan” concern for global financial markets.
While past geopolitical tensions have occasionally fueled the “digital gold” narrative, recent market reactions suggest that Bitcoin (BTC) now behaves as a high-sensitivity risk asset during the initial stages of a similar conflict.
What Donald Trump Is Saying
As of today, the market is on edge after Trump threatened 25% tariffs on any country doing business with Iran.
“Effective immediately, any Country doing business with the Islamic Republic of Iran will pay a Tariff of 25% on any and all business being done with the United States of America. This Order is final and conclusive. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump said.
Later on, Trump disclosed that he is no longer ready to talk with Iranian officials, suggesting that the window for diplomacy may have closed.
Instead, he urged the people to keep protesting, assuring them that help is on the way, which has fueled the speculation that the U.S might invade the country soon.
“Iranian Patriots, KEEP PROTESTING – TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!!! Save the names of the killers and abusers. They will pay a big price. I have cancelled all meetings with Iranian Officials until the senseless killing of protesters STOPS. HELP IS ON ITS WAY,” The US President added.
Get These Top Crypto Casino Offers Now!
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
If U.S.–Iran tensions escalate into direct military action, it would mark another foreign intervention.
That would come just weeks after the U.S. operation in Venezuela that captured Nicolás Maduro and removed him from power, an event that has already shaken global risk sentiment.
What Else Is Happening in Iran?
For context, Iran has seen a sharp escalation in anti-government protests over the past few days.
What began roughly two weeks ago as demonstrations over economic hardship has since grown into a movement challenging the country’s authoritarian leadership.
Security forces have responded with force. This has intensified both the unrest and international concern.
The economic backdrop helps explain the anger. Iran’s currency has experienced a significant decline, with the Iranian rial (IRR) losing approximately 2,280% of its value against the U.S. dollar over the past year.
Because $1 is now equal to 1,069,860 IRR, as shown above.
That level of depreciation has crushed purchasing power and fueled public frustration. In turn, this has added economic pressure to an already volatile political situation.
If a full-scale U.S. invasion or a significant airstrike campaign were to occur, here is the likely impact on Bitcoin’s price and the broader cryptocurrency market, based on current 2026 data and historical precedents.
The Initial Shock: The “Liquidity Flush”
Contrary to the popular “safe haven” theory, Bitcoin’s price often suffers an immediate price crash upon the news of a kinetic military strike.
Historical Precedent (June 2025): When the U.S. struck Iranian nuclear facilities in mid-2025, BTC crashed below $105,000, wiping out roughly $40 billion in market cap within hours.
Why it happens: In moments of extreme uncertainty, institutional traders move into “risk-off” mode. They liquidate volatile assets (such as crypto) to cover margin calls on traditional stocks or to move into Gold and Oil, which typically surge in these scenarios.
The Liquidation Cascade: A 2026 invasion would likely trigger a massive liquidation of leveraged long positions, potentially driving BTC down to its primary support zones near $80,000 and $87,000.
2. The “Digital Gold” Decoupling (The Recovery)
While the first 48 hours are usually bearish, Bitcoin’s price has a history of rebounding faster than traditional equities once the initial shock subsides.
Hedge Against Debasement: War is expensive and is typically funded by government debt and the printing of money. Investors often pivot back to Bitcoin as a hedge against the inflationary debasement of the U.S. Dollar that usually accompanies prolonged conflicts.
24/7 Market Advantage: Because crypto markets never close, they are the first to “price in” the bottom of a crisis. By the time traditional stock exchanges open on a Monday morning, Bitcoin has frequently already begun its recovery.
However, it is essential to note that the outcome could be different this time if it were to happen. Notably, gold and silver prices have been outperforming BTC over the past year.
Therefore, if that were to happen now, Bitcoin’s price might struggle to trade much higher.
Bitcoin Institutional Accumulation Rises, But…
At the time of writing, BTC had reclaimed $94,000. Yet, the chart still does not show a clean path toward $100,000.
Price action remains hesitant, and buyers have not confirmed an extended breakout.
However, the balance-sheet story continues to strengthen in the background. Glassnode data shows that corporate Bitcoin treasuries—across public and private companies have grown steadily over the past six months.
Holdings increased from approximately 854,000 BTC to around 1.11 million BTC over the past six months. That’s an increase of around 260,000 BTC, which works out to roughly 43,000 BTC per month.
This trend is significant because it indicates persistent institutional absorption. Companies are not trading short-term swings. They are adding to long-duration holdings.
As that demand continues, it can help tighten available supply and support Bitcoin’s price uptrend during pullbacks.
However, if the U.S. decides to strike Iran, these institutions could hold back on accumulating more coins. In that scenario, Bitcoin’s price could drop below the $90,000 support level.
BTC Price Analysis
From a technical perspective, reclaiming $94,000 has helped Bitcoin build an ascending triangle on its daily chart.
This pattern typically forms when buyers continue to print higher lows while sellers defend a flat ceiling, often setting up a breakout if demand persists.
Momentum also looks supportive. The Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) has pushed above the zero line, which suggests capital is flowing back in.
At the same time, the Supertrend has flipped bullish, with the green line now positioned below the price, rather than the red line acting as overhead pressure.
If these signals hold, BTC could attempt a break above the upper resistance near $98,111.
If Bitcoin clears that ceiling and buyers follow through, the next bullish target comes into view near $108,921, around the 0.618 Fibonacci level.
However, the key risk remains macro shock. Markets are currently watching rising U.S.–Iran tensions, including talk of potential strikes, but there is no confirmed U.S. invasion based on current reporting.
If geopolitics escalate sharply and trigger a broad risk-off move, BTC could drop quickly toward $91,436. If selling accelerates from there, the coin could also lose the $87,000 support.
How About Altcoins and Other Assets?
In a wartime scenario, the altcoin market often suffers more severely and for longer than Bitcoin. Should the US invade Iran, here is what could happen to some of the top altcoins:
Ethereum (ETH): Historically, ETH has shown a higher correlation to risk sentiment than BTC. During the 2025 strikes, while BTC dropped 2%, ETH plummeted 7%. In a full-scale invasion, ETH could test primary support levels near $2,600 to $2,800.
Privacy Coins (XMR, ZEC, DASH): Assets such as Monero, Zcash, and Dash often experience “speculative inflows” during regional conflicts. As citizens in conflict zones seek ways to move capital outside of sanctioned or failing banking systems, the utility of privacy coins becomes increasingly apparent. Additionally, the prices of XMR, ZEC, and DASH have been increasing lately. Should Trump decide to give the green light to strike Iran, the prices of privacy coins might increase.
Asset
Immediate Reaction (0-72 hrs)
Mid-Term Reaction (1-3 Months)
Bitcoin (BTC)
Sharp Drop (-10% to -15%)
Strong Recovery (Hedge against debasement)
Gold (XAU)
Vertical Surge (+5% to +8%)
Steady Gains (Traditional safe haven)
Ethereum (ETH)
Deep Correction (-20%+)
Lagging Recovery (Risk-on sentiment)
Oil (WTI)
Massive Spike (Supply risk)
High Volatility (Energy crisis fears)
US Sanctions Against Iran: The History
1979: The US first imposed sanctions on Iran after Iranian students seized the U.S. embassy in Tehran and took Americans hostage.
Meanwhile, the Islamic Revolution overthrew Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, whose regime relied on repression and torture and lacked a democratic mandate.
Earlier, in 1953, the U.S. and the UK backed a coup that removed Iran’s democratically elected prime minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh, and restored the shah to power.
Also in 1979, Washington halted Iranian oil imports and froze $12 billion in Iranian assets.
In 1995, President Bill Clinton barred US companies from investing in Iran’s oil and gas sector and banned most trade and investment with Iran.
A year later, Congress required sanctions on foreign firms investing more than $20m annually in Iran’s energy sector.
In 2006, the UN Security Council imposed sanctions on Iran’s nuclear-related trade and froze assets linked to its nuclear programme.
As Iran resumed uranium enrichment in 2005, the UN later expanded sanctions, and the EU followed with its own measures.
In 2015, Iran signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with the US, EU, China, France, Germany, Russia, and the UK.
Specifically, Iran agreed to halt uranium enrichment at the Fordow facility for 15 years and convert it into a research centre.
However, in 2018, President Donald Trump withdrew the US from the JCPOA and reimposed all lifted sanctions.
At the same time, his administration launched a “maximum pressure” campaign targeting Iran’s energy, metals, petrochemical sectors, and senior officials.
In 2019, the US designated Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.
On Jan. 3, 2020, the US killed Qassem Soleimani, head of the IRGC’s Quds Force, in a drone strike in Baghdad and imposed further sanctions.
From 2021 to 2025, the Biden administration kept most US sanctions on Iran in place.
Finally, in September 2025, the UN reimposed sanctions after the Security Council voted against permanently lifting economic restrictions tied to Iran’s nuclear programme.
How This Has Affected the Iranian People
Iran’s income fell sharply over the past decade. GDP per capita dropped from over $8,000 in 2012 to just above $5,000 in 2024, mainly due to US sanctions.
First, sanctions have a significant impact on oil exports. Exports declined by 60% to 80% after 2018, resulting in tens of billions of dollars in lost state revenue.
Although exports later recovered to about 1.5 million barrels per day, they remain below pre-2018 levels.
Meanwhile, sanctions reshaped the economy. They pushed trade into informal channels and expanded corruption through intermediaries, shadow fleets, and opaque deals.
At the same time, the currency collapsed. The rial lost most of its value, driving inflation, raising import costs, and eroding investor confidence. Sanctions also blocked access to dollars, further restricting trade.
Finally, key sectors suffered. Aviation stands out, as decades of sanctions prevented aircraft imports and contributed to deadly accidents over many years.
In summary, it remains unclear whether the U.S. will ultimately resort to military action against Iran.
At the same time, the impact on the Iranian people is challenging to predict, especially given the growing unrest and uncertainty already gripping the country.
Disclaimer:
The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, financial advice. We do not make any warranties regarding the completeness, reliability, or accuracy of this information. All investments involve risk, and past performance does not guarantee future results. We recommend consulting a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
Victor Olanrewaju is a crypto analyst and reporter at CCN with deep roots in on-chain research and technical analysis. His crypto journey began in 2017, but it was the 2020 Uniswap airdrop that sparked a full-time pivot into the space.
With a foundation in copywriting, Victor honed his craft creating high-converting content for leading crypto brokers — most notably an XRP price prediction that ranked #1 on Google during the 2021 bull run.
He later joined AMBCrypto in 2022, where he combined storytelling with technical and on-chain analysis to cover key market narratives.
In 2024, he expanded his expertise at BeInCrypto, collaborating with analysts and using tools like Glassnode, Santiment, and IntoTheBlock to break down Bitcoin and altcoin trends.
At CCN, Victor covers the top cryptocurrencies, memecoins, macro shifts, blending real-time insights with deep-dive metrics.
He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Physics from the University of Ibadan, equipping him to simplify complex data for a wide audience. Follow his work or connect on LinkedIn or X.
