Key Takeaways
The US Department of the Treasury’s semiannual regulatory agenda, published on Aug 16, highlights a forthcoming federal initiative aimed at equating the regulatory standards for cryptocurrencies with those for traditional fiat currency.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network are set to amend the definition of “money” as it appears in the Bank Secrecy Act.
The agenda indicates that the agencies plan to confirm that the regulations encompass transactions involving convertible virtual currencies, which are recognized either as having a currency-equivalent value or as substitutes for currency despite not having legal tender status. Additionally, the proposal intends to broaden reporting requirements to include digital assets that possess legal tender status, such as central bank digital currencies.
According to the Keynote 183 from the Act:
“Clarification of the Requirement to Collect, Retain, and Transmit Information on Transactions Involving Convertible Virtual Currencies and Digital Assets With Legal Tender Status”
The final notice of proposed rulemaking is slated for September 2025, pending approval. This development follows a recent action by the US government, which moved about 10,000 Bitcoin associated with an old Silk Road raid on Aug 14.
Alongside its focus on cryptocurrencies, the Department of Justice is also actively updating regulations and legal frameworks concerning artificial intelligence. On Aug 7, the DOJ requested that the United States Sentencing Commission revise its guidelines to include higher penalties for crimes facilitated by AI. These proposed changes aim to extend the current guidelines to encompass any criminal activity that is aided or abetted by basic algorithms.
In June, the US Supreme Court struck down the Chevron doctrine, which has reduced the Securities and Exchange Commission’s power to regulate cryptocurrency policies.
This shift could benefit the cryptocurrency sector, which has been navigating regulatory uncertainties and vigorous enforcement by the SEC under Chairman Gary Gensler. The decision implies that agencies must now exercise greater restraint in extending their regulatory purview, particularly in emerging fields like cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence.
Furthermore, this change could influence ongoing legal disputes involving the SEC and prominent crypto enterprises such as Coinbase, Ripple, Binance, and Kraken. These firms have contended that the SEC has exceeded its mandate by categorizing certain digital assets as securities.
In May, the US Treasury and IRS rolled out new tax guidelines for cryptocurrency brokers. Starting in 2026, these regulations will mandate detailed transaction reporting and record-keeping of token costs.
More recently, Senators Wyden and Lummis voiced their concerns about the Department of Justice treating crypto software services as equivalent to unlicensed money-transmitting businesses. They argued that this could potentially violate First Amendment rights, underlining a growing tension in the regulatory landscape.
These regulatory efforts underscore a broader recognition of cryptocurrencies and digital assets as integral elements of the financial landscape. By standardizing reporting requirements for cryptocurrencies with those of traditional currencies, regulators aim to increase transparency and curb potential illegal activities in the cryptocurrency sector.