A cross-party group of UK lawmakers has called for a sweeping ban on gambling advertising just as new figures revealed that remote casinos generated £1.5 billion in three months.
The House of Lords Liaison Committee said the government should treat gambling advertising as a public health issue and introduce a comprehensive ban “as soon as practicable.”
Its report was published on Thursday, the same day the Gambling Commission released figures covering the first three months of 2026.
The committee’s 173-page report targets advertising and sponsorship across sport, broadcasting, social media and more channels.
The recommendations include removing gambling logos from sports kits and venues and considering a ban on operators’ use of influencers and content creators.
It also wants regulators to prohibit phrases such as “free bet” and introduce a comprehensive ban on inducements, covering the full range of promotional offers used to attract customers.
On-course advertising at horse and greyhound racing events would be exempt under the proposed framework.
The government would separately assess whether lottery and off-course racing advertisements should face the same restrictions.
It also accused successive governments of failing to respond adequately to content marketing that blurs the boundary between advertising and editorial material.
If ministers reject a comprehensive ban, the committee said Britain should at least replace its partly self-regulatory system with a regime overseen by the Gambling Commission.
The political move arrived alongside new data revealing the scale of Britain’s regulated gambling market.
Remote casino operators recorded £1.5 billion in gross gambling yield between January and March 2026, according to the Gambling Commission’s quarterly statistics.
That represented 68.3% of the £2.2 billion generated across the combined remote casino, betting and bingo sector.
Gross gambling yield broadly represents stakes and other gambling-related income retained after paying winnings. It is not the total amount wagered.
Britain’s entire regulated gambling industry generated £4.4 billion during the quarter when lotteries were included, or £3.4 billion excluding them.
The committee estimates that between one million and 1.5 million adults in Great Britain may be experiencing problem gambling.
It argued that advertising helps stimulate and maintain demand, meaning a comprehensive ban would likely shrink the gambling sector.
The regulated industry has long argued that restricting legal advertising would make licensed brands less visible and drive customers toward offshore operators with fewer protections.
The Lords committee acknowledged that illegal gambling presents a serious threat, but said it had not seen strong evidence that restrictions would cause customers to flock towards unlicensed sites.
The Betting and Gaming Council strongly opposed the findings.
Chief Executive Grainne Hurst told The Guardian that a blanket ban would weaken one of the advantages held by licensed companies while failing to stop illegal operators from targeting British customers.
A nationwide ban is not imminent.
The committee cannot change advertising rules itself, and the government must decide whether to adopt its recommendations.
Evidence submitted to the inquiry indicated that ministers currently have no plans to legislate against advertising.
However, the Sept. 17 report appears to mark the start of a significant political fight over gambling and its advertising.