NFT Giants on the Brink? Digital Chamber Rushes to Shield Industry From SEC Probe
The Digital Chamber has put the SEC on blast for its approach to NFT regulation. (Photo by Alexi Rosenfeld/Getty Images)
- Blockchain advocacy group the Digital Chamber has called out the SEC for its actions against the NFT industry.
- SEC has sued multiple NFT companies and settled with one in 2024.
- The blockchain advocacy group has urged legislators to issue clearer guidelines on NFTs.
As the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) dragnet increasingly sweeps up digital assets, a brewing battle is unfolding over the regulatory fate of NFTs.
In response, the Digital Chamber (TDC), a blockchain advocacy group, urged for clearer guidelines and requested that certain NFTs be exempt from the SEC’s securities classification.
TDC Calls on Legislators For Clear Definition of NFTs
The Digital Chamber has come out swinging against the SEC’s approach to regulating the NFT industry, asserting that its overreach threatens to strangle a thriving sector in its cradle. The group’s warning comes on the heels of the SEC’s recent Wells notice issued to OpenSea.
TDC shared that the SEC’s persistent pursuit of high-profile cases is suffocating the industry and driving companies out of the U.S.
In its statement, TDC urged lawmakers to take swift action and establish a clear definition of certain NFTs as consumer goods, exempting them from federal securities laws.
“Congress must act now to ensure that this burgeoning industry remains within the U.S. for the benefit of the U.S. economy and does not move overseas to more favourable regulatory environments. The Digital Chamber strongly encourages Congress to clarify that Consumptive-Use NFTs are consumer goods and not financial products,” the group warned.
A Two-Pronged Approach
TDC issued a two-point notice for legislators on regulating NFTs.
- First, lawmakers should clearly state that NFTs created for consumptive use are not financial products.
- Second, NFTs should not be classified as securities under the SEC’s authority or as any other type of financial instrument.
The advocacy group cited its 2023 report , which analyzed various aspects of the NFT market, including digital art, collectibles, and play-to-earn video games.
The report found that many NFT-based ecosystems are not designed as investment contracts or financial tools for speculation.
Even if some consumers occasionally sell NFTs for a profit, TDC argued that this does not constitute a security, just as traditional artworks are not considered a security simply because their value appreciates over time.
SEC’s Approach is Jeopardizing a Nascent Tech
A chorus of critics is growing louder in its condemnation of the SEC’s approach to regulating the NFT industry, with the Digital Chamber’s concerns merely the latest addition to the din.
The SEC’s regulation-by-enforcement strategy has drawn widespread scorn, with many arguing that the agency’s actions have far-reaching implications that threaten to stifle innovation.
The regulator’s recent actions against NFT platforms have drawn particular scrutiny, with many accusing the agency of applying a double standard.
Ripple’s chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty, was among those who highlighted the SEC’s apparent hypocrisy , pointing to a 1976 ruling that allowed art galleries to promote and sell art to buyers with investment motives without registering with the SEC. The SEC’s stance on NFTs, he argues, flies in the face of this precedent.
The implications of the SEC’s stance on NFTs extend far beyond the realm of digital art, which is just one facet of a rapidly expanding ecosystem.
From ticketing and event experiences to other innovative applications, the question remains: Will the SEC consider NFTs used in these contexts to be securities as well? The lack of clarity is breeding uncertainty and threatening to stifle innovation.
SEC’s Enforcement Action and Howey Test
In 2024, the SEC charged two prominent NFT platforms, DraftKings and Dapper Labs , alleging that their sale of NFTs violated securities law. The SEC’s recent Wells notice to OpenSea has only added to the uncertainty.
DraftKings, which began selling NFTs in 2021, was forced to shutter its platform in July. Dapper Labs, on the other hand, opted to settle with the SEC for $4 million.
In a post-settlement tweet, Dapper Labs CEO Roham Gharegozlou disclosed that the legal discovery process had revealed that the NFTs were hosted on a decentralized public network. This, he argued, meant that digital collectibles like NBA Top Shot were not securities in the same vein as trading cards.
The settlement and Gharegozlou’s subsequent comments suggest that not all NFTs are equal and that some may not qualify as securities.
This highlights the urgent need for modern, tailored regulatory guidelines for decentralized technologies.
Currently, the SEC relies on the Howey Test to determine whether an asset constitutes a security. However, some SEC commissioners, including Hester Peirce, have voiced concerns that this antiquated standard is ill-suited to assess cutting-edge technologies like crypto.
OpenSea in Hot Water, SEC Claim NFTs on the Marketplace Are Securities
