Gemini Cuts MIT From Hiring Pipeline Over Gary Gensler Connection

Key Takeaways

• Gemini co-founder Tyler Winklevoss severed ties with MIT due to Gary Gensler’s affiliation.
• Gensler is set to return as a professor at MIT after his tenure at the SEC.
• Similar moves were made by Coinbase, which announced in December that it would avoid working with anyone connected to former SEC staff.

Winklevoss twins-founded crypto exchange Gemini has taken a firm stance against any association with former Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Gary Gensler.

The exchange announced that it would blacklist any institution or individual connected to Gensler, citing his controversial tenure as the catalyst for their decision.

Gemini Blacklists MIT, Gensler Affiliation a Big No

Tyler Winklevoss, in a post on X , clarified that Gemini would not hire graduates from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) as long as Gensler remained linked to the university.

This decision came in response to reports suggesting that Gensler, after stepping down from his role at the SEC, was slated to return to MIT as a Professor of the Practice in both the Global Economics and Management Group and the Finance Group.

Gensler’s Legacy at the SEC

Gensler’s leadership at the SEC was marked by widespread criticism, particularly from the crypto industry.

Under his watch, the SEC launched numerous lawsuits against prominent crypto firms, resulting in hefty fines and settlements.

His aggressive stance on enforcement, coupled with a lack of clear regulatory guidelines, drew the ire of many in the crypto space.

Several lawmakers and even fellow SEC commissioners, including Hester Peirce, called for more comprehensive clarity on crypto regulations rather than punitive measures against firms operating in a legally ambiguous environment.

The Crypto Industry’s Response

Gemini is not alone in distancing itself from Gensler’s influence.

In December 2024, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong announced that the company would sever ties with any law firms employing individuals from Gensler’s SEC administration.

Armstrong was particularly vocal about his discontent with law firms that had hired former SEC officials, citing it as a conflict of interest.

In a scathing critique, Armstrong accused former SEC leadership of undermining the crypto industry through what he described as “ethics violations.”

He emphasized that the industry’s refusal to embrace clear regulatory guidelines from the SEC contributed to the damage caused by Gensler’s aggressive enforcement actions.

The reactions from crypto leaders underscore a broader sentiment within the industry: a desire to ensure that figures like Gensler do not benefit from an industry they are seen to have harmed.

Paradigm co-founder Matt Huang also voiced support for the movement, calling on MIT alumni in the crypto world to unite against Gensler’s return to academia.

In the eyes of many in the crypto community, Gensler’s return to the academic world is seen as a paradox.

After years of alleged overreach and regulatory hostility toward the crypto industry, there is a growing consensus that Gensler should not be allowed to profit from an industry he reportedly tried to dismantle.