The U.S. and Europe are diverging on digital currencies. While President Trump supports USD-backed stablecoins to strengthen dollar dominance, the ECB sees them as a risk to EU financial stability.
In response, the ECB is pushing for a digital euro, but both stablecoins and a CBDC could drain deposits from European banks.
Furthermore, global de-dollarization efforts, including a potential BRICS currency, add urgency to the ECB’s plans.
In an interview with Reuters, European Central Bank member Piero Cipollone said that Trump’s plans to support USD-pegged stablecoins will speed up legislative backing for the digital euro.
However, the U.S. and Europe have contrasting views on stablecoins. While European regulators see stablecoins, particularly those backed by government debt, as a risk to financial stability, the Trump administration views them as a potential opportunity.
U.S. stablecoins are seen as a way to promote the U.S. dollar’s dominance globally and increase demand for U.S. Treasuries, potentially lowering long-term interest rates.
In contrast, the ECB is concerned that U.S.-backed stablecoins could destabilize the EU’s financial system. In response, the ECB is pushing forward with plans for a digital euro, aiming to offer an alternative to dollar-based stablecoins.
The ECB fears that widespread use of U.S. stablecoins for payments could siphon deposits away from European banks. Europe’s regulations on stablecoins aim to limit exposure to government bonds, while the U.S. views stablecoins as a beneficial public-private partnership.
This divergence in approach may accelerate the EU’s efforts to launch a digital euro, with expectations of faster progress in the coming months.
European banks may face a growing challenge as U.S. dollar-backed stablecoins and the ECB’s proposed digital euro threaten to pull deposits away from traditional banking institutions.
Stablecoins, particularly those backed by U.S. Treasuries, are gaining traction as a payment method and investment vehicle, allowing users to move funds outside the European banking system.
The ECB warned that if eurozone residents increasingly adopt U.S. stablecoins, deposits could shift to the U.S., reducing European banks’ liquidity and lending capacity.
At the same time, the ECB’s push for a digital euro poses another risk. While intended to provide a State-backed alternative to private stablecoins, the digital euro could also drain deposits from commercial banks.
To mitigate this, the ECB plans to cap digital euro holdings at a few thousand euros and ensure they remain non-interest-bearing.
Despite these measures, European banks remain concerned about losing deposits on both fronts—either to U.S. stablecoins that operate outside EU regulation or to a digital euro that shifts control of money away from traditional lenders.
The global push for de-dollarization, particularly through initiatives like a potential BRICS currency, is adding urgency to the European Central Bank’s plans for a digital euro.
As countries seek alternatives to the U.S. dollar in trade and reserves, the eurozone faces both challenges and opportunities in the evolving monetary environment.
A BRICS-backed currency—potentially tied to gold or a basket of national currencies—could weaken the dollar’s dominance in global finance.
If successful, it may reduce the need for countries to hold U.S. dollars for trade settlements, shifting some demand to alternative reserve assets, including the euro.
This shift could incentivize the ECB to accelerate the digital euro project to strengthen the euro’s global standing and provide an official, state-backed digital payment system.
At the same time, de-dollarization could lead to reduced liquidity in dollar-based financial markets, affecting European banks and trade partners who rely on USD-based transactions.
A digital euro could help mitigate these risks by providing an efficient, cross-border alternative that enhances the euro’s role in international trade and finance.
However, challenges remain. The success of a digital euro depends on widespread adoption, regulatory clarity, and compatibility with existing financial systems.
If BRICS nations succeed in creating a viable alternative to the dollar, the euro must also evolve to remain competitive.