Bitcoin’s Quantum Countdown: What the Q-Day Prize Means for Crypto

Key Takeaways

• Project Eleven is offering 1 BTC to the first team or individual that can break Bitcoin’s ECC using a quantum computer. It’s a global challenge to stress-test Bitcoin’s cryptographic foundation under real-world conditions.
• Quantum computers can’t break Bitcoin yet, but rapid advancements—like Google’s Willow and Microsoft’s Majorana—signal that Shor’s algorithm could soon become practical.
• Over 10 million Bitcoin addresses have exposed public keys. If quantum computers break ECC, up to $500 billion in BTC could be vulnerable—especially old wallets, including Satoshi Nakamoto’s untouched coins.
• Developers are exploring soft fork upgrades and hybrid cryptographic models to make Bitcoin quantum-resistant. Lattice-based and hash-based signatures (like SPHINCS+ and Dilithium) lead the pack in post-quantum defense strategies.

​​Project Eleven, a quantum computing research firm, has launched the Q-Day Prize, offering 1 Bitcoin (BTC) to the first individual or team that can break an elliptic curve cryptographic (ECC) key using Shor’s algorithm on a quantum computer.

This article explains what the Q-Day Prize is, how advances in quantum computing could affect Bitcoin’s security, and what crypto holders should know as the industry begins preparing for potential long-term risks.

Q-Day Prize in Crypto Explained

The Q-Day Prize is a global challenge to assess the real-world threat quantum computing poses to Bitcoin’s cryptographic security. 

Participants are tasked with demonstrating the ability to crack ECC keys, which underpin Bitcoin’s security model, using quantum computing techniques. The competition runs until April 5, 2026, and the first successful attempt will be awarded 1 BTC, valued at $94,631 (approx.) as of April 30, 2025.

Why is quantum computing a significant threat to Bitcoin?

If a quantum computer ever reaches the point where it can crack elliptic curve cryptography (ECC), it could unlock early Bitcoin wallets, including the 1.1 million BTC tied to Satoshi Nakamoto, which have never moved.

Who Organizes the Q-Day Prize?

​The Q-Day Prize is organized and administered by Project Eleven (P11), a quantum computing research and advocacy firm. Launched on April 16, 2025, the initiative will reward the first individual or team that can break an ECC key using Shor’s algorithm on a quantum computer.

Project Eleven’s mission with the Q-Day Prize is to assess the real-world threat quantum computing poses to Bitcoin’s cryptographic security. It aims to encourage practical demonstrations of cryptographic vulnerability, thereby accelerating the development of quantum-resistant protocols.

Can Quantum Computing Break Bitcoin’s Security?

Project Eleven highlights that over 10 million Bitcoin addresses have exposed public keys, making them susceptible to quantum attacks. If quantum computers can break ECC, more than 6 million BTC, valued at around $500 billion, could be at risk.

Bitcoin’s security relies heavily on ECC, specifically the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA). 

Quantum computers, leveraging Shor’s algorithm, have the theoretical capability to efficiently solve problems that are currently infeasible for classical computers, such as factoring large numbers and computing discrete logarithms—both fundamental to ECC.

If a sufficiently powerful quantum computer is developed, it could potentially derive private keys from public keys, compromising the security of Bitcoin addresses.

What Happens If Satoshi’s Private Keys Are Cracked?

Quantum computing isn’t an immediate threat to Bitcoin but a serious long-term concern. Bitcoin’s current security model depends on elliptic curve cryptography, which could be broken if quantum computers become powerful enough to solve the discrete logarithm problem using algorithms like Shor’s.

This risk primarily applies to older wallets with exposed or reused public keys. As of 2025, quantum computers haven’t yet reached that level of capability — but progress is ongoing, especially with developments like IBM’s Willow architecture.

Notably, Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, is believed to possess over 1 million BTC. These coins have remained untouched for years. 

If quantum computing advances to the point where Satoshi’s private keys can be derived from the associated public keys, it could lead to significant market upheaval, loss of confidence in Bitcoin’s security, and potential financial losses.

History of Quantum Computing Threats in Crypto

The history of quantum computing threats in crypto is closely tied to the development of quantum algorithms that could compromise traditional cryptographic systems. Here’s a concise overview:

Early Warnings (1994 – 2000s)

• In 1994, Peter Shor developed Shor’s algorithm, a quantum algorithm that can efficiently factor large numbers and compute discrete logarithms—key to breaking Rivest–Shamir–Adleman (RSA), Digital signature algorithm (DSA), and ECC, including Bitcoin’s ECDSA.
• This theoretical breakthrough sparked concern among cryptographers, although no quantum hardware existed at the time to implement it.

Cryptography Community Awareness (2000s – 2010s)

• As quantum computing research progressed, the cryptography community began exploring post-quantum cryptography (PQC) to prepare for future threats.
• Bitcoin, launched in 2009, uses secp256k1, an ECC system vulnerable to Shor’s algorithm, raising theoretical concerns.
• However, practical quantum computers remained far off, and no urgent action was taken.

Rising Concerns (2015 – 2020)

• Tech companies like Google and IBM demonstrated early quantum supremacy, showing quantum advantage in narrow cases (though not yet cryptographic).
• Security experts and blockchain developers began discussing Q-Day—the hypothetical moment a quantum computer could break classical cryptography.
• Some crypto projects (e.g., QANplatform, Quantum Resistant Ledger) started integrating quantum-safe cryptography.

Policy and Competition Era (2020s – Present

• In 2022, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) selected candidates for post-quantum cryptographic standards, boosting global interest in PQC.
• In December 2024, Google unveiled Willow, a 105-qubit superconducting quantum processor. Willow achieved a computation in under five minutes that would take an estimated 10 septillion years for a classical supercomputer, demonstrating its potential for solving complex problems beyond the reach of classical computers.
• In February 2025, Microsoft introduced Majorana 1, the world’s first quantum processor powered by topological qubits. This chip leverages a new state of matter to enhance qubit stability and scalability, aiming to scale to a million qubits on a single chip. Majorana 1 represents a significant step toward building practical, large-scale quantum computers.
• In April 2025, Project Eleven launched the Q-Day Prize, offering 1 BTC to anyone who can break ECC with a real quantum computer—marking a turning point from theory to experimentation.
• Bitcoin core developers and other blockchain researchers have started exploring quantum-resistant upgrade paths, though no consensus has emerged.

Current Status  (As of April 2025)

• No quantum computer exists today that can break Bitcoin’s cryptography.
• Still, the community is preparing for the post-quantum future—through awareness, incentives like the Q-Day Prize, and ongoing PQC research.

Bitcoin’s Quantum Defense: Embracing Post-Quantum Cryptography

Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) refers to cryptographic algorithms that are secure against both classical and quantum attacks. These algorithms are often based on hard mathematical problems unrelated to factoring or discrete logarithms, which quantum computers target.

Common PQC approaches include:

• Lattice-based cryptography: Lattice-based cryptography uses complex math grids called “lattices” to hide data. Solving problems like finding the shortest path in these grids is extremely hard — even for quantum computers. These techniques are fast and versatile, making them great for encryption and digital signatures. They are among the most promising options for future-proofing security, with algorithms like CRYSTALS-Kyber and Dilithium being top candidates.
• Multivariate polynomial cryptography: This method is based on solving equations with many variables — think of it as a complex math puzzle. It’s very easy to create such puzzles but extremely hard to reverse-engineer them without knowing the secret. This approach is mostly used for digital signatures. It’s secure, even against quantum attacks, but can involve large key sizes and complicated implementation.
• Code-based cryptography: Code-based cryptography is inspired by error correction — like fixing a message that got scrambled during transmission. Only someone with the right “repair instructions” (private key) can unscramble it. These systems are very secure and have been studied for decades. Their main downside is the large size of public keys, which can be tricky for some applications.
• Hash-based signatures: This method uses hash functions — like digital fingerprints — to sign data. Each message gets a unique signature using these hashes. It’s one of the simplest and most secure methods against quantum threats. However, some types only allow one-time use per key, while others (like SPHINCS+) solve this with longer signatures. They’re great for digital signatures but not ideal for general encryption.

The broader crypto industry is also investing in crypto quantum resistance, looking for ways to retrofit existing chains or migrate to quantum-hardened structures.

Would Bitcoin Need a Hard Fork or Soft Fork to Become Quantum-Resistant?

A soft fork would be more practical than a hard fork, which risks network splits and broader disruption. However, how such an upgrade would be designed, tested, and deployed remains hypothetical. 

Soft Fork Proposals

Some proposals suggest Bitcoin could be upgraded via a soft fork to support quantum-resistant signature schemes such as:

• XMSS (eXtended Merkle Signature Scheme)
• SPHINCS+ (a stateless hash-based signature)
• CRYSTALS-Dilithium (a lattice-based algorithm)

Hybrid Approaches

To minimize risk, developers advocate for hybrid signature schemes — combining classical and post-quantum signatures — until PQC is proven secure and practical under real-world conditions.

Quantum resistance is viewed as a long-term issue, and it has yet to become a focused priority in Bitcoin’s development roadmap.

Challenges in Post-Quantum Transition

Transitioning Bitcoin to quantum-resistant cryptography isn’t straightforward:

• Backward compatibility with existing wallets and infrastructure.
• Block and transaction sizes increase due to larger key and signature sizes in PQC.
• Consensus challenges around implementing and agreeing on changes.
• Algorithm maturity is important since many PQC schemes are new and untested in the wild.

Conclusion

Project Eleven’s Q-Day Prize is a proactive measure to assess and address the potential risks quantum computing poses to Bitcoin. The initiative aims to catalyze the development and adoption of quantum-resistant cryptographic solutions by incentivizing real-world demonstrations of quantum vulnerabilities, ensuring long-term security and integrity of blockchain technologies.

Bitcoin’s quantum defense is no longer a theoretical discussion — it’s a necessity for long-term survival. While large-scale quantum computers are not yet available, preparing today ensures that the Bitcoin network remains robust and trustworthy tomorrow.

The path forward involves proactive research, community consensus, and careful implementation of quantum-safe cryptographic tools. By embracing post-quantum cryptography, Bitcoin can uphold its promise of being a secure, decentralized store of value in an era dominated by quantum computation.

FAQs