Key Takeaways
- The eSports platform eFuse has put its new Creator League tournament on ice.
- Creator League suspended after fans objected to the use of blockchain.
- Also a key influencer walked away from the competition.
- The incident highlights the resentment some gamers feel toward blockchain and NFTs.
Just three days after launching its new eSports tournament, eFuse has slammed the breaks on Creator League following a fan backlash over its use of the NEAR blockchain.
The controversy highlights a growing rift within the gaming community between those who embrace NFTs and blockchain tech and those who want nothing to do with it.
How “Blockchain” Became a Toxic Word For Some Gamers
When NFT gaming first emerged its advocates lauded it as a revolution that would empower users and democratize the ownership of in-game products. However, things didn’t pan out quite the way early proponents of the technology anticipated.
When Minecraft famously banned blockchain integrations last year, its developer argued that the “speculative pricing and investment mentality around NFTs takes the focus away from playing the game.” The decision compounded a pre-existing association between NFTs and rampant profiteering that has divided gaming communities ever since.
On eSports forums, the oft-derided “NFT bro” is the subject of ridicule—a scammy nuisance more interested in inflating the price of their latest digital collectibles than actual gaming.
Meanwhile, many gamers perceive NFTs as little more than an unwelcome monetization strategy forced upon them by developers.
A string of scams and rug pulls in the blockchain gaming space has only served to further entrench crypto-skepticism.
Devs Insists Creator League Passes Aren’t NFTs
When eFuse unveiled Creator League on September 2, it promised an eSports tournament where influencers and their fans would compete in various games throughout the season.
But only a day later, one of the eight influencers scheduled to take part in the tournament had already pulled out.
In a tweet announcing his decision to withdraw, the YouTuber Connor Colquhoun, also known as CDawgVA, explained his reasoning to followers: “I was not told or made aware at any point that there was Blockchain technology and was only made aware of that information when the event went live,” he said.
“Given my vocal hatred of such tech, I would never agree to join had I known that,” Colquhoun added.
To be fair to Colquhoun, eFuse didn’t actively promote NEAR’s role in Creator League. Instead of associating the competition with the blockchain gaming hype, eFuse presented Creator League as a simple eSports tournament with user identification managed through ‘community passes.
However, upon closer examination, it becomes evident that the league recorded its community passes on-chain.
In a statement on Tuesday, September 5, 2023, eFuse emphasized that “community passes are not considered NFTs nor a token launch.” It stressed that the passes were not intended to be transferred and the NEAR was only to be used on the back end “to provide additional transparency.”
The company said that any passholders who are uncomfortable with the use of blockchain technology can request a refund.
However, with refunds only available at request, and no word yet on a Creator League relaunch, some critics feel that their objections are valid.
Comment
byu/TheRealPdGaming from discussion
inCoDCompetitive
James Morales is CCN’s blockchain and crypto policy reporter. He has been working in the news media since 2020, writing about topics such as payments, banking and financial technology. These days, he likes to explore the latest blockchain innovations and the evolving landscape of global crypto regulation.
With an educational background in social anthropology and media studies, James uses his platform as a journalist to explore how new technologies work, why they matter and how they might shape our future.
