A conspiracy to prevent financial institutions from engaging with the cryptocurrency industry known as “Operation Chokepoint 2.0” appears to be more fact than fiction as a gigantic trove of damning documents reveals all.
Ahead of the U.S. Senate Banking Committee’s Feb. 5, 2025, hearing on debanking, the acting Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Travis Hill, released 175 documents signaling that, indeed, the anti-crypto conspiracy Operation Chokepoint 2.0 is real .
Notably, 25 “pause” letters were sent in 2022, heavily advising banks and financial institutions under FDIC supervision to cease “all crypto asset-related activity.” As per the FDIC, documents released today reveal these requests were “almost universally met with resistance.”
The banks wanted to work with crypto, but the FDIC refused to budge or even engage, meeting requests for information with months of silence. That, or follow up with directives to “pause, suspend, or refrain” from expanding blockchain and crypto activities.
During the hearing, Old Glory Bank CEO Mike Ring claimed that regulatory agencies coordinated in launching notices that suppressed crypto engagement.
He is referring to the FDIC’s FIL-16-2022 and the SAB-121 accounting rule from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), both of which served to “choke out” banks acting as crypto custodians.
He notes it’s unlikely that both of these directives being published in April 2022 is a coincidence.
One of the more troubling revelations is that the Federal Reserve seems to have also played a role in Operation Chokepoint 2.0, as a page from its internal handbook has guidelines on how to review applications for “master accounts,” which plug institutions directly into the Fed’s systems and services.
These accounts are vital for business. Think of the master account as a bank account with the Fed. It’s one of the few places a big institution can store money with 100% fiat backing. It also streamlined operations and allows financial institutions to process, settle, and handle transactions without relying on another bank.
The Fed was able to exercise dominion over emerging sectors such as cannabis and crypto by denying these accounts, especially to new banks who would work with such industries. The Fed has denied accusations of discrimination. As per a statement from Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott:
“This issue should concern every American, regardless of political affiliation and that’s why I am committed a bipartisan solution to stop this form of discrimination. This hearing is just the beginning.”
It’s not just crypto that got hit. The emerging phenomenon of debanking citizens because of the nature of their legal business, political or religious creed, or other affiliations is a big issue in America.
During the hearing, Senator Elizabeth Warren noted in her opening remarks that Donald Trump was “on to a real problem” when he called out the Bank of America for debanking at Davos.
In fact, her staff discovered that the other three big banks, Citibank, JP Morgan, and Wells Fargo, also accounted for half of all debanking complaints made to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Whilst governments and regulators have a responsibility to maintain secure guardrails to protect consumers and financial institutions from unwittingly backing/providing financial services to malicious actors, these recent findings suggest a dubious amount of foul play.