Peanut the Squirrel’s Owner Hits Binance With Cease and Desist for IP Violation

Key Takeaways

• Mark Longo, owner of Peanut the Squirrel, has sent a cease-and-desist letter to Binance.
• Longo accuses Binance of using his intellectual property.
• Longo has vowed to continue issuing cease-and-desist letters to others who infringe upon his intellectual property rights.

Mark Longo, the owner of Peanut the Squirrel, has taken legal action against Binance, accusing the crypto exchange of unauthorized use of his intellectual property.

The cease-and-desist letter, sent through Longo’s law firm, claims that Binance has used the trademark “PNUT” and an image of a squirrel wearing a cowboy hat without permission.

Peanut the Squirrel Owner To Sue Memecoin Creators?

Peanut, a beloved pet squirrel who tragically was euthanized by New York State authorities in November, became an internet sensation.

Following the squirrel’s euthanization, a memecoin featuring the PNUT ticker was launched on Solana.

The coin quickly gained traction, achieving a billion-dollar market cap within a week of its debut and earning listings on major cryptocurrency exchanges.

While the memecoin’s rapid success has drawn attention to Peanut’s legacy, it has also prompted questions about intellectual property rights in the crypto sphere.

Longo’s legal team is now seeking justice for the alleged infringement on his intellectual property. The owner has made it clear this is just the first of many cease-and-desist actions he plans to take.

In a post on X , Longo emphasized his commitment to suing companies, saying,

“This is the first of multiple cease-and-desist letters. I’m committed to sending a clear message: unauthorized IP use will not be tolerated. WE WILL GET JUSTICE.”

A Growing Problem in the Crypto Space

Peanut the Squirrel is not alone in facing challenges related to unauthorized use of intellectual property.

Last month, the creator of the viral “just a chill guy” meme threatened legal action against anyone profiting from the image by creating memecoins.

The memecoin frenzy has become a double-edged sword for the crypto community.

On one hand, these coins have attracted thousands of newcomers and fueled the spread of crypto memes.

On the other, the explosion of memecoins has also led to a surge in scams, intellectual property theft, and, in some cases, disturbing content such as racism and violence.

The Ethical Dilemma of Censorship in Crypto

Blockchain platforms face a difficult dilemma. On one hand, cracking down on harmful or offensive content goes against the decentralized ethos of the crypto space.

On the other hand, allowing such content to proliferate leads to intellectual property theft, scams, and other malicious activities.

Platforms like Solana’s Pump.fun, a memecoin creator tool, have been criticized for hosting violent and racist content, prompting the United Kingdom to block access to the site.

As the popularity of memecoins continues to grow, the tension between decentralization and the need to protect creators’ rights remains unresolved.