Home / Headlines / Headlines Opinion / Mark Zuckerberg’s Machiavellian Strategy to Crush a Facebook Boardroom Coup

Mark Zuckerberg’s Machiavellian Strategy to Crush a Facebook Boardroom Coup

Last Updated September 23, 2020 1:33 PM
Mark Emem
Last Updated September 23, 2020 1:33 PM
  • Mark Zuckerberg currently holds nearly 90% of Class B shares in Facebook.
  • Facebook’s board has remained without a lead independent director for months.
  • Zuckerberg’s hold on the board is unlikely to end soon.

In the past few years, calls to oust Mark Zuckerberg as chairman at Facebook’s (NASDAQ:FB) annual shareholder meetings have become a ritual.

Besides insisting on the separation of the CEO and chairman’s position, independent shareholders have demanded the abolishment of the dual-class share structure. Facebook’s Class A shares that ordinary investors hold currently amount to 2.41 billion.

Meanwhile, Zuckerberg controls 88.1% of Class B shares. Each Class B share has 10 votes while Class A shares only possess one vote. Despite not being as many, Class B shares have a combined voting power of nearly 4 billion. Insiders can thus overrule ordinary investors every time even if the latter vote as a bloc.

Mark Zuckerberg
Source: Twitter 

The governance reform proposals were made to enhance shareholder value. So far they have been rejected. Despite the immense power he wields already, Zuckerberg is not taking any chances and has recently taken measures to ensure that the status quo remains.

Is Zuckerberg only stacking the board with loyalists?

Earlier this week, Facebook appointed Dropbox (NASDAQ:DBX) co-founder  and CEO Drew Houston to its board. On various occasions, Houston has described Zuckerberg as a “close friend.” The Facebook CEO also mentored Houston. Given the choice of acting in the interests of independent shareholders or his buddy, it’s obvious whose interests will be sacrificed.

Source: Twitter 

This isn’t the first piece of evidence that Zuckerberg is keen on building a firewall around him by only appointing loyalists. Last year, Facebook named Peggy Alford  to its board. She formerly served the former chief financial officer of the philanthropic organization Zuckerberg and his wife founded – the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.

Other directors at Facebook such as Peter Thiel, Sheryl Sandberg and Marc Andreessen  are also seen as Zuck loyalists if their actions and support of Zuckerberg are anything to go by.

At the same time, independent-minded directors have left as loyalists have joined. Netflix founder and CEO Reed Hastings was no yes-man, and he left the board in 2019 .

Facebook goes for months without a lead independent director

Other actions that Zuckerberg has taken to ensure there’s no threat to his reign at Facebook are more subtle. Last October Facebook’s lead independent director of four years Dr. Susan Desmond-Hellmann resigned from the board  to focus on her duties as the CEO of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Since then, the position has remained vacant.

The role of the lead independent director is critical, especially as pertains to pushing shareholder interests.

Notably, just last year, independent shareholders led by New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer urged Desmond-Hellmann to investigate  whether

governance arrangements have contributed to the development of Facebook’s corporate culture, inadequate responses to significant problems and failure to recognize increased responsibilities to stakeholders.

In response, Facebook stated that its audit committee had been beefed up. It’s likely the lead independent director’s seat will only be filled after an amenable candidate has been found. This is likely to put more power in Zuckerberg’s hands as consolidation continues.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of CCN.com.