Fund Manager: US Might Have Already Lost Crypto Innovation Race

As U.S. lawmakers wrestle with what to do with Facebook's Libra, they are being forced to confront another digital currency that they've been trying to avoid like the plague – bitcoin. Unfortunately, the longer lawmakers wait, the more left behind the U.S. becomes as crypto innovation goes elsewhere. Even Facebook chose Switzerland for its Libra coin.

Crypto fund manager Brian Kelly worries that it might already be too late. He pointed out on CNBC that while traveling the world, he can't help but notice that "other countries are way ahead of the U.S," saying:

"The U.S. may have already lost the race...It's very concerning to me. Asia is eating the U.S.' lunch. The U.S. is the center of finance. We should take the lead in it."*

He may be right. While the Libra hearings have forced Congress to confront crypto, policymakers clearly haven't changed their archaic approach to the market. How do they plan on forming a regulatory framework for the industry? By creating more committees and taskforces, of course.

Crypto Committee Overload

CoinShares Chief Strategy Officer Meltem Demirors testified before the U.S. House Financial Services Committee today, where she took it upon herself to help lawmakers differentiate between Facebook's attempt at a cryptocurrency and bitcoin. She told CNBC:

"Today what you saw today in the House...was lawmakers are trying to understand what is Libra? Nobody really understands. Libra would like to be a cryptocurrency. That is how Facebook is styling this."

Demirors made the point that "cryptocurrencies aren't going away," pointing to the $266 billion combined market cap of the broader crypto market. Given her front-row seat to Congress, Demirors described an environment in which representatives are ready to provide some regulatory clarity to the market. She is quick to draw a distinction between cryptocurrency and Libra, essentially placing them into two separate buckets.

As for regulation, Demirors appears encouraged,

"Lawmakers are very aware that the U.S. needs to remain competitive, that regulatory clarity is tantamount...I think it's too early to say whether new regulation will be applied. I do think we'll see the formation of a committee to focus on the issue of cryptocurrencies and possibly a subcommittee to focus on the issue of Libra."

If that's the case, then why is Washington, D.C. continuing on this path of committee overload? That appears to be their answer to anything they intend to punt on – form a new group and so far it hasn't led to much fruit. But the good news is that the world now knows about bitcoin. What happens next, at least as far as what role the U.S. will play in bitcoin adoption, will set the stage for decades to come.

*Direct quotes are a rough translation of a live TV interview.

This article is protected by copyright laws and is owned by CCN Markets.

About the author

Gerelyn Terzo
Gerelyn Terzo

Gerelyn is Assistant Editor at CCN. Based in the U.S., she has also covered institutional investing on Wall Street but caught the bitcoin bug soon after. She resides 13 miles outside of New York, close enough but also far enough away to escape it all. Follower her on Twitter (@cryptogerelyn) or email [email protected]

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!