Barclays, the UK’s biggest bank, has applied for three U.S. patents that collectively outline a system that uses blockchain technology to combine the pseudonymity of cryptocurrency with the legacy financial system and its KYC/AML regime.
The London-based bank first applied for the three patents in July 2016, though they were only published by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) on Thursday.
In one patent, Barclays proposes a system that allows particular users on the network to create and destroy units of digital currency on a blockchain network. Such users — perhaps a central bank or other financial institution — are able to alter the currency’s monetary supply by using special “currency issuer secret keys,” which allow them to add new units of currency to the network’s public ledger, and “currency destroyer secret keys,” which authorize them to remove specific units of currency from the ledger.
The patent authors explain that such a system could be used to allow users to deposit funds at a bank or other currency conversion service and convert them into digital currency, then withdraw them from the ledger later, all without altering the balance between the total value of currency in the digital currency system and all other currency systems. In other words, Barclays seems to envision a fiat-pegged stablecoin as the basis for its blockchain network.
From the patent:
” [T]he units of digital currency may be set to any form of currency unit (for example, it may be set to a unit of fiat currency, such as US dollars, Euros, Pounds Sterling, etc), such that the digital currency represents an alternative way of keeping and spending fiat currency. This may have advantages in that the digital currency will not fluctuate in value against the fiat currency to which it is set.”
The destroy function could also be used to replace unspent funds referencing older blocks in the ledger with outputs in new blocks, enabling the ledger to discard older blocks and reduce the amount of storage space required to operate a node.
Finally, this tool could be used to seize funds that become associated with fraudulent or other criminal activities. But though this function would be a boon to institutions concerned about complying with anti-money laundering regulations, it’s easy to imagine it raising concerns among consumers.
Just look at the controversy surrounding the ability of EOS block producers to freeze accounts on the recommendation of an independent arbitration agency. This feature, once hailed as a way to help users recover stolen funds and make cryptocurrency more user-friendly, has incited so much debate that even EOS mastermind Dan Larimer has proposed altering the EOS constitution to reduce the authority of block producers to freeze accounts.
Under the proposed system, one or many third parties can individually or collectively vouch for the identity or reputation of another user on the network, such as a cryptocurrency wallet holder.
A classic example of this are services that are required by law to restrict access to users above a certain age, such as 18. Having to perform age verification with every such service is not only time consuming but also makes it more likely that sensitive personal information will fall into the hands of hackers.
In Barclays’ proposed system, a user could make certain claims when conducting transactions on the network — e.g. that he or she is old enough to purchase an age-restricted item from a merchant. If the user has already performed age verification with another trusted third party — perhaps their primary banking institution or another merchant — the seller can verify this through the blockchain’s “claims tree,” removing the need for them to manually review verification claims.
Moreover, users could register for cryptocurrency wallets on the network with minimal documentation and only undergo one-time KYC verification as needed to transact with other users dealing in restricted products or services.
Depending on the sensitivity of this data, verified claims could also be cryptographically obscured, ensuring that only certain entities can access user information through the network.
Ultimately, the bank envisions that such a system could be used to verify the integrity of a myriad of claims, ranging from driving privileges to creditworthiness to the ownership of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and the authorization of these devices to transact in digital currency.
However, Barclays — a multinational financial institution with tens of thousands of employees working out of offices located across the world — argues that this system would benefit not only consumers but also actors throughout the economic supply chain.
At a basic level, banks and merchants would spend less time on KYC/AML compliance, reducing overhead and streamlining their internal operations. It could also improve data security since the volume of personal information held by individual institutions would be much smaller than at present.
“This may result in improved security, better risk decisions and a financial opportunity for the operational role that they may now play in retail and other transactions,” the patent authors wrote. “Banks in particular may benefit by a significant reduction in the processing (e.g. computer processing) and financial costs of maintaining systems of record and providing the necessary scrutiny to regulators and others.”
The devil, though, is in the details, and time will tell whether such a system ever sees the light of day.
Images from Shutterstock