Kraken CEO and co-founder Jesse made headlines recently for his strongly-worded response to the New York Attorney General’s request for information on the Kraken exchange, the largest bitcoin exchange based on euro volume in the world.
Powell fired back at the NYAG calling the questionnaire insulting, and stated that the startup company could not address all 34 points without diverting resources needed to fulfill their promises to customers to meet their roadmap goals on time. He refused to answer the questionnaire, suggesting that the US government make an appointment and send officials to San Francisco in person if they wanted to learn more about his business.
Somebody has to say what everybody's actually thinking about the NYAG's inquiry. The placative kowtowing toward this kind of abuse sends the message that it's ok. It's not ok. It's insulting. https://t.co/sta9VuXPK1 pic.twitter.com/4Jg66bia1I
— Jesse Powell (@jespow) April 18, 2018
Powell elaborated on the decision to do this in a blog post on Sunday, stating:
“We left our cushy jobs as founders of another successful company out of an ideological motivation to build that legitimate, professional exchange which would be capable of bridging crypto with traditional financial institutions and bringing it to the mainstream. That is still our mission today.””
Powell listed the reasons for refusing to answer the questionnaire in the post, with the primary issues being that they had already provided much of the information, the request for new information would disrupt Kraken’s business, Kraken does not have New York clients, and the request essentially in Powell’s view amounted to unpaid consultancy work helping the NYAG to understand the crypto space. Powell pointed out that he would have equally refused the request had it been made from a North Korean attorney as well. The full list of reasons is as follows:
The deadline of 2 weeks is unreasonable given the scope.
The publication of the request, lack of any prior communication and inclusion of exchanges which are clearly outside of the AG’s jurisdiction (including Kraken) raise questions about the true motive. It comes off as a publicity stunt.
The request is ill-prepared. It’s an overly broad fishing expedition that asks questions irrelevant to the stated objective and misses obvious questions that actually would be helpful.
Much of this information was already provided to the NYDFS in 2014.
Much of this information was already provided to FinCEN in our 2017 audit.
Much of this information is publicly available on our website.
Some of this information is proprietary, trade secret information and kept confidential for competitive reasons.
Some of this information is highly sensitive and kept confidential for security reasons.
It is not clear that the complete production can remain private, especially given the government’s recent track record of getting hacked.
The AG demands Kraken, which has no NY clients, to assist in protecting NY consumers (presumably against those who have obtained the BitLicense), without offering any sort of compensation for the professional consulting work.
Pointedly, he added:
Kraken is always willing to work with regulators and law enforcement. Whether you think you have us by the balls or not, approaching us with some basic respect and having a conversation is always going to make the interaction smoother and help you get what you want faster than storming in with your “or else” list of demands.
Kraken on Regulation
Powell makes it very clear that he feels personally insulted by the request for suggesting that Kraken was in some way subservient to the NYAG in a way that a non-crypto related company would not be, and stressed that his was a legitimate business and that while scams were rampant in the crypto space, crpyo-specific regulation was not necessary to prevent cases of simple fraud. The SEC has charged a number of ICO founders with fraud recently, the co-founders of the Centra Tech ICO being a prime example.
Powell pointed out that he was willing to help the NYAG and US government understand the crypto space and was even willing to do so for free, but seemed to take real offence at what he perceived as an order handed down from what he called an “ivory tower”. He stated that customers cared about trading and security, not regulation and “conforming to Wall St.’s image of what crypto markets should be”. He has stated on a number of occasions that crypto investors need to look out for themselves and perform due diligence when investing.
His firm stance against the New York AG has divided opinions, but certainly made big waves in the crypto community and may end up prompting other exchanges to re-evaluate their options when it comes to dealing with government authorities.
Featured image from Shutterstock.